Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study

Bone diseases and consequent defects present a significant challenge in the orthopedics. Synthetic scaffolds mimic bone porose structures and can be substituted in bone defects. In this study, we designed and evaluated four scaffold models with different architectures (regular Voronoi (Rv), irregula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alaa Alhelal, Daver Ali, Mohammed Hasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Advances in Polymer Technology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/adv/2529277
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849729681512726528
author Alaa Alhelal
Daver Ali
Mohammed Hasan
author_facet Alaa Alhelal
Daver Ali
Mohammed Hasan
author_sort Alaa Alhelal
collection DOAJ
description Bone diseases and consequent defects present a significant challenge in the orthopedics. Synthetic scaffolds mimic bone porose structures and can be substituted in bone defects. In this study, we designed and evaluated four scaffold models with different architectures (regular Voronoi (Rv), irregular Voronoi (Iv), Star (S), and Vintiles (V) structures). Additionally, the scaffolds were designed with four different porosities (50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%), and 16 scaffold models were designed and manufactured using the three-dimensional (3D) printing (3DP) method. The models were fabricated using two photosensitive resins (50% PLA-Pro resin and 50% P-CROWN [zirconia and ceramic]). Thus, the models’ mechanical properties were tested using compression tests. The results showed porosity plays an essential role in scaffold mechanical behavior. Moreover, the architecture was effective in the mechanical performance of the models. The elastic modulus of the models was 4–30 MPa, which is close to trabecular bone mechanical properties. The S-50 model showed a maximum stress of 17.75 MPa, which was 20 times higher than the S-80 model. Similar results were visible in other groups of scaffolds. In all four groups, 50% and 80% porosity scaffolds showed the highest and lowest mechanical strength, respectively. The results of this study showed that the Voronoi structure mimics bone morphology with a stochastic porosity and demonstrated a mechanical property similar to the scaffold with regular structures, which confirms its compatibility with bone tissue engineering. The outcomes of this study shed more light on scaffold design and fabrication for bone defects.
format Article
id doaj-art-343cc3b09d70484f87cc53fcc2cfb370
institution DOAJ
issn 1098-2329
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Polymer Technology
spelling doaj-art-343cc3b09d70484f87cc53fcc2cfb3702025-08-20T03:09:08ZengWileyAdvances in Polymer Technology1098-23292025-01-01202510.1155/adv/2529277Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative StudyAlaa Alhelal0Daver Ali1Mohammed Hasan2Faculty of EngineeringFaculty of EngineeringFaculty of EngineeringBone diseases and consequent defects present a significant challenge in the orthopedics. Synthetic scaffolds mimic bone porose structures and can be substituted in bone defects. In this study, we designed and evaluated four scaffold models with different architectures (regular Voronoi (Rv), irregular Voronoi (Iv), Star (S), and Vintiles (V) structures). Additionally, the scaffolds were designed with four different porosities (50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%), and 16 scaffold models were designed and manufactured using the three-dimensional (3D) printing (3DP) method. The models were fabricated using two photosensitive resins (50% PLA-Pro resin and 50% P-CROWN [zirconia and ceramic]). Thus, the models’ mechanical properties were tested using compression tests. The results showed porosity plays an essential role in scaffold mechanical behavior. Moreover, the architecture was effective in the mechanical performance of the models. The elastic modulus of the models was 4–30 MPa, which is close to trabecular bone mechanical properties. The S-50 model showed a maximum stress of 17.75 MPa, which was 20 times higher than the S-80 model. Similar results were visible in other groups of scaffolds. In all four groups, 50% and 80% porosity scaffolds showed the highest and lowest mechanical strength, respectively. The results of this study showed that the Voronoi structure mimics bone morphology with a stochastic porosity and demonstrated a mechanical property similar to the scaffold with regular structures, which confirms its compatibility with bone tissue engineering. The outcomes of this study shed more light on scaffold design and fabrication for bone defects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/adv/2529277
spellingShingle Alaa Alhelal
Daver Ali
Mohammed Hasan
Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
Advances in Polymer Technology
title Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
title_full Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
title_short Design and Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds With Regular and Irregular Voronoi Architectures: A Comparative Study
title_sort design and fabrication of bone scaffolds with regular and irregular voronoi architectures a comparative study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/adv/2529277
work_keys_str_mv AT alaaalhelal designandfabricationofbonescaffoldswithregularandirregularvoronoiarchitecturesacomparativestudy
AT daverali designandfabricationofbonescaffoldswithregularandirregularvoronoiarchitecturesacomparativestudy
AT mohammedhasan designandfabricationofbonescaffoldswithregularandirregularvoronoiarchitecturesacomparativestudy