Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The long history and extensive use of antibiotics have caused resistant bacterial pathogens to emerge, increasing mortality and morbidity. The current study was designed to see the prevalence of aerobic bacterial isolates with their antimicrobial resistance pattern from out- and inpatients requested...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fizza Khalid, Christy Poulose, Dalal Farah Mousa Farah, Abid Mahmood, Azza Elsheikh, Osamah T. Khojah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Microbiology Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7481/15/4/135
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850085257032761344
author Fizza Khalid
Christy Poulose
Dalal Farah Mousa Farah
Abid Mahmood
Azza Elsheikh
Osamah T. Khojah
author_facet Fizza Khalid
Christy Poulose
Dalal Farah Mousa Farah
Abid Mahmood
Azza Elsheikh
Osamah T. Khojah
author_sort Fizza Khalid
collection DOAJ
description The long history and extensive use of antibiotics have caused resistant bacterial pathogens to emerge, increasing mortality and morbidity. The current study was designed to see the prevalence of aerobic bacterial isolates with their antimicrobial resistance pattern from out- and inpatients requested for wound or pus culture. Retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in central Riyadh from January 2023 to December 2023. Samples were collected and inoculated onto the appropriate media following standard guidelines. Bacterial pathogens were identified by the Vitek2 compact system. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as well as by MIC determination through the Vitek2 compact. A total of 1186 subjects were included in the study with a bacterial isolation rate of 691 (58.3%). Out of these, 155 positive cultures had incomplete information or anaerobic or fungal growth and were excluded from the study. With a slight female predominance (54.9%), the majority of subjects (72.2%) were outpatients, and over half of the isolates (55.2%) were Gram-positive. The most common isolate was <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (44.4%), followed by <i>E. coli</i> (13.6%) and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (12.9%). The highest resistance was reported against penicillin followed by fusidic acid against Gram-positive bacteria. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) was detected in 40.5% of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) isolates. Amikacin was the most susceptible antibiotic against all Gram-negative isolates. MDR Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 51.9% of wound infection isolates (95% CI: 45.95 to 58.33) while 6.3% (95% CI: 4.39 to 8.86) were XDR (nonsusceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories). A high prevalence of bacterial isolates, with <i>S. aureus</i> as the predominant pathogen, showed high rates of multidrug resistance. This highlights the importance of monitoring antibiotic choices for prophylaxis and treatment in the study area.
format Article
id doaj-art-3422b05cebf44d0c835af2035e42198e
institution DOAJ
issn 2036-7481
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microbiology Research
spelling doaj-art-3422b05cebf44d0c835af2035e42198e2025-08-20T02:43:46ZengMDPI AGMicrobiology Research2036-74812024-10-011542015203410.3390/microbiolres15040135Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaFizza Khalid0Christy Poulose1Dalal Farah Mousa Farah2Abid Mahmood3Azza Elsheikh4Osamah T. Khojah5Microbiology Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12333, Saudi ArabiaMicrobiology Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12333, Saudi ArabiaMicrobiology Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12333, Saudi ArabiaMicrobiology Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12333, Saudi ArabiaMicrobiology Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12333, Saudi ArabiaPathology Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi ArabiaThe long history and extensive use of antibiotics have caused resistant bacterial pathogens to emerge, increasing mortality and morbidity. The current study was designed to see the prevalence of aerobic bacterial isolates with their antimicrobial resistance pattern from out- and inpatients requested for wound or pus culture. Retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in central Riyadh from January 2023 to December 2023. Samples were collected and inoculated onto the appropriate media following standard guidelines. Bacterial pathogens were identified by the Vitek2 compact system. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as well as by MIC determination through the Vitek2 compact. A total of 1186 subjects were included in the study with a bacterial isolation rate of 691 (58.3%). Out of these, 155 positive cultures had incomplete information or anaerobic or fungal growth and were excluded from the study. With a slight female predominance (54.9%), the majority of subjects (72.2%) were outpatients, and over half of the isolates (55.2%) were Gram-positive. The most common isolate was <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (44.4%), followed by <i>E. coli</i> (13.6%) and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (12.9%). The highest resistance was reported against penicillin followed by fusidic acid against Gram-positive bacteria. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) was detected in 40.5% of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) isolates. Amikacin was the most susceptible antibiotic against all Gram-negative isolates. MDR Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 51.9% of wound infection isolates (95% CI: 45.95 to 58.33) while 6.3% (95% CI: 4.39 to 8.86) were XDR (nonsusceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories). A high prevalence of bacterial isolates, with <i>S. aureus</i> as the predominant pathogen, showed high rates of multidrug resistance. This highlights the importance of monitoring antibiotic choices for prophylaxis and treatment in the study area.https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7481/15/4/135wound infectionprevalenceantimicrobial resistanceMDRMRSARiyadh
spellingShingle Fizza Khalid
Christy Poulose
Dalal Farah Mousa Farah
Abid Mahmood
Azza Elsheikh
Osamah T. Khojah
Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Microbiology Research
wound infection
prevalence
antimicrobial resistance
MDR
MRSA
Riyadh
title Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_full Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_short Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound and Pus Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
title_sort prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of wound and pus bacterial pathogens at a tertiary care hospital in central riyadh saudi arabia
topic wound infection
prevalence
antimicrobial resistance
MDR
MRSA
Riyadh
url https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7481/15/4/135
work_keys_str_mv AT fizzakhalid prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia
AT christypoulose prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia
AT dalalfarahmousafarah prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia
AT abidmahmood prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia
AT azzaelsheikh prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia
AT osamahtkhojah prevalenceandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatternsofwoundandpusbacterialpathogensatatertiarycarehospitalincentralriyadhsaudiarabia