Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort

Introduction. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a rapid and noninvasive method of body composition analysis; however, reproducibility between BIA instruments in pregnancy is uncertain. Adverse maternal body composition has been linked to pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Bai, Daniella Susic, Anthony J. O’Sullivan, Amanda Henry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3128767
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850157124452089856
author Michelle Bai
Daniella Susic
Anthony J. O’Sullivan
Amanda Henry
author_facet Michelle Bai
Daniella Susic
Anthony J. O’Sullivan
Amanda Henry
author_sort Michelle Bai
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a rapid and noninvasive method of body composition analysis; however, reproducibility between BIA instruments in pregnancy is uncertain. Adverse maternal body composition has been linked to pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of three BIA instruments in pregnancy and analyse the relationship between the body composition and the GDM risk. Methods. A prospective cohort (n = 117) of women with singleton pregnancies participating in the Microbiome Understanding in Maternity Study (MUMS) at St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Anthropometric measurements and BIA body composition were measured at ≤13 weeks (T1), 20–24 weeks (T2), and 32–36 weeks (T3) of gestation. Body fat percentage (BFP), total body water (TBW), and impedance were estimated by three BIA instruments: Bodystat 1500, RJL Quantum III, and Tanita BC-587. GDM status was recorded after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 28 weeks or earlier. Agreement between BIA instruments was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Logistic regression modelling explored associations of BFP with GDM. Results. Method comparison reproducibility between Bodystat and RJL was stronger than between Bodystat and Tanita for both BFP and TBW% at all three time points. RJL overestimated BFP on average by 3.3% (p<0.001), with limits of agreement within ±5% for all trimesters. Average BFP was not significantly different between Tanita and Bodystat although limits of agreement exceeded ±5%. GDM diagnosis was independently associated with increased BFP in T1 (adjusted OR 1.117 per 1% increase; 95% CI 1.020–1.224; p=0.017) and in T2 (adjusted OR 1.113 per 1% increase; 95% CI 1.010–1.226; p=0.031) and with Asian ethnicity in all models (OR 7.4–8.1). Conclusion. Reproducibility amongst instruments was moderate; therefore, interchangeability between instruments, particularly for research purposes, cannot be assumed. In this cohort, GDM risk was modestly associated with increasing BFP and strongly associated with Asian ethnicity.
format Article
id doaj-art-341c71d2070243d283ad32bdd23231bb
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-341c71d2070243d283ad32bdd23231bb2025-08-20T02:24:17ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162020-01-01202010.1155/2020/31287673128767Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS CohortMichelle Bai0Daniella Susic1Anthony J. O’Sullivan2Amanda Henry3School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, AustraliaSchool of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, AustraliaDepartment of Endocrinology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, AustraliaSchool of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, AustraliaIntroduction. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a rapid and noninvasive method of body composition analysis; however, reproducibility between BIA instruments in pregnancy is uncertain. Adverse maternal body composition has been linked to pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of three BIA instruments in pregnancy and analyse the relationship between the body composition and the GDM risk. Methods. A prospective cohort (n = 117) of women with singleton pregnancies participating in the Microbiome Understanding in Maternity Study (MUMS) at St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Anthropometric measurements and BIA body composition were measured at ≤13 weeks (T1), 20–24 weeks (T2), and 32–36 weeks (T3) of gestation. Body fat percentage (BFP), total body water (TBW), and impedance were estimated by three BIA instruments: Bodystat 1500, RJL Quantum III, and Tanita BC-587. GDM status was recorded after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 28 weeks or earlier. Agreement between BIA instruments was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Logistic regression modelling explored associations of BFP with GDM. Results. Method comparison reproducibility between Bodystat and RJL was stronger than between Bodystat and Tanita for both BFP and TBW% at all three time points. RJL overestimated BFP on average by 3.3% (p<0.001), with limits of agreement within ±5% for all trimesters. Average BFP was not significantly different between Tanita and Bodystat although limits of agreement exceeded ±5%. GDM diagnosis was independently associated with increased BFP in T1 (adjusted OR 1.117 per 1% increase; 95% CI 1.020–1.224; p=0.017) and in T2 (adjusted OR 1.113 per 1% increase; 95% CI 1.010–1.226; p=0.031) and with Asian ethnicity in all models (OR 7.4–8.1). Conclusion. Reproducibility amongst instruments was moderate; therefore, interchangeability between instruments, particularly for research purposes, cannot be assumed. In this cohort, GDM risk was modestly associated with increasing BFP and strongly associated with Asian ethnicity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3128767
spellingShingle Michelle Bai
Daniella Susic
Anthony J. O’Sullivan
Amanda Henry
Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
Journal of Obesity
title Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
title_full Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
title_short Reproducibility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Pregnancy and the Association of Body Composition with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: A Substudy of MUMS Cohort
title_sort reproducibility of bioelectrical impedance analysis in pregnancy and the association of body composition with the risk of gestational diabetes a substudy of mums cohort
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3128767
work_keys_str_mv AT michellebai reproducibilityofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpregnancyandtheassociationofbodycompositionwiththeriskofgestationaldiabetesasubstudyofmumscohort
AT daniellasusic reproducibilityofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpregnancyandtheassociationofbodycompositionwiththeriskofgestationaldiabetesasubstudyofmumscohort
AT anthonyjosullivan reproducibilityofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpregnancyandtheassociationofbodycompositionwiththeriskofgestationaldiabetesasubstudyofmumscohort
AT amandahenry reproducibilityofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisinpregnancyandtheassociationofbodycompositionwiththeriskofgestationaldiabetesasubstudyofmumscohort