PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Introduction/Justification: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a common malignancy in the upper aerodigestive tract, strongly associated with smoking and alcohol consumption. It is already well known that tumors development and progression depend on immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matheus Yung Perin, Daniele Daiane Affonso, Carlos Takahiro Chone, Gustavo Jacob Lourenço, Carmen Silvia Passos Lima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-05-01
Series:Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925000495
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849725761046446080
author Matheus Yung Perin
Daniele Daiane Affonso
Carlos Takahiro Chone
Gustavo Jacob Lourenço
Carmen Silvia Passos Lima
author_facet Matheus Yung Perin
Daniele Daiane Affonso
Carlos Takahiro Chone
Gustavo Jacob Lourenço
Carmen Silvia Passos Lima
author_sort Matheus Yung Perin
collection DOAJ
description Introduction/Justification: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a common malignancy in the upper aerodigestive tract, strongly associated with smoking and alcohol consumption. It is already well known that tumors development and progression depend on immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a primary mechanisms of immune evasion. The PDCD1 gene encodes PD-1 and is a polymorphic gene. Objectives: His study aims to evaluate the influences of the PD1.1 (c. -606G>A), PD1 (c.627+252C>T), PD1.5 (c.804C>T) and PD1.9 (c.644C>T) single variants (SNVs) in PDCD1 gene influence the risk, clinicopathological aspects and survival of LSCC patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including 284 patients with LSCC and 296 healthy controls (blood donors) seen at the General Hospital of University of Campinas. Clinical and pathological data were collected from the medical records by the main researcher. Genotypes of PDCD1 variants were identified using real-time PCR with TaqMan® probes. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression for LSCC risk assessment. Bonferroni analysis was used in comparison of multiple variables. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test and univariate and multiple Cox regression were used to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological aspects and genotypes of SNVs on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Results: Similar frequencies of isolated and combined SNV genotypes were seen patients and controls. The frequencies of combined genotypes of SNVs, GA or AA + CT or TT of PD1.1 + PD1.5 and CT or TT + CT or TT of PD1.5 and PD1.9, were more common in patients with glottic tumor than in patients with tumors in other locations. The CC genotype of PD1 SNV and the CC + CC combined genotype of PD1.5+PD1 SNVs were more common in patients with tumors at stage III or IV than in patients with tumors at stage I or II. In multivariate Cox analysis, patients with BMI≤ 24.9 kg/m², ECOG ≥ 1, tumors at stage III/IV, and not submitted to surgical tumor resection had 1.81 (95%CI: 1,25-2,62%), 1.60 (95%CI: 1,14-2,24), 1.93 (1,24-3,00), and 1.80 (1,20-2,71) more chances of evolving to death than the remaining patients. In addition, patients with TT genotype of PD1.5 SNV and TT + CC combined genotype of PD1.5 and PD1 SNVs had a 1.59 (95% CI: 1.06-2.41) and a 2.97 (95% CI:1.43-6.18) more chances of evolving to death than others. Conclusion: Our data indicates: 1) The analyzed SNVs in the PDCD1 gene do not influence LSCC risk, 2) PD1, PD1.5, and PD1.9 affect LSCC location, 3) PD1 and PD1.5 influence LSCC aggressiveness, 4) BMI, ECOG, tumor stage, lack of surgical tumor resection, PD1 and PD1.5 SNVs are independent prognostic factors for OS of LSCC patients. These findings reinforce the importance of studying inherited biomarkers in oncology, which may contribute to risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches. Acknowledgements: The study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino e à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP #2019/09168-8; #2023/09738-4, and Cancer Theranostics Innovation Center, CancerThera, CEPID FAPESP #2021/10265-8).
format Article
id doaj-art-33c6f8600bda40468d17ca103aad30e4
institution DOAJ
issn 2531-1379
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
spelling doaj-art-33c6f8600bda40468d17ca103aad30e42025-08-20T03:10:23ZengElsevierHematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy2531-13792025-05-014710378110.1016/j.htct.2025.103781PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAMatheus Yung Perin0Daniele Daiane Affonso1Carlos Takahiro Chone2Gustavo Jacob Lourenço3Carmen Silvia Passos Lima4Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrazilUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, BrazilIntroduction/Justification: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a common malignancy in the upper aerodigestive tract, strongly associated with smoking and alcohol consumption. It is already well known that tumors development and progression depend on immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a primary mechanisms of immune evasion. The PDCD1 gene encodes PD-1 and is a polymorphic gene. Objectives: His study aims to evaluate the influences of the PD1.1 (c. -606G>A), PD1 (c.627+252C>T), PD1.5 (c.804C>T) and PD1.9 (c.644C>T) single variants (SNVs) in PDCD1 gene influence the risk, clinicopathological aspects and survival of LSCC patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including 284 patients with LSCC and 296 healthy controls (blood donors) seen at the General Hospital of University of Campinas. Clinical and pathological data were collected from the medical records by the main researcher. Genotypes of PDCD1 variants were identified using real-time PCR with TaqMan® probes. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression for LSCC risk assessment. Bonferroni analysis was used in comparison of multiple variables. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test and univariate and multiple Cox regression were used to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological aspects and genotypes of SNVs on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Results: Similar frequencies of isolated and combined SNV genotypes were seen patients and controls. The frequencies of combined genotypes of SNVs, GA or AA + CT or TT of PD1.1 + PD1.5 and CT or TT + CT or TT of PD1.5 and PD1.9, were more common in patients with glottic tumor than in patients with tumors in other locations. The CC genotype of PD1 SNV and the CC + CC combined genotype of PD1.5+PD1 SNVs were more common in patients with tumors at stage III or IV than in patients with tumors at stage I or II. In multivariate Cox analysis, patients with BMI≤ 24.9 kg/m², ECOG ≥ 1, tumors at stage III/IV, and not submitted to surgical tumor resection had 1.81 (95%CI: 1,25-2,62%), 1.60 (95%CI: 1,14-2,24), 1.93 (1,24-3,00), and 1.80 (1,20-2,71) more chances of evolving to death than the remaining patients. In addition, patients with TT genotype of PD1.5 SNV and TT + CC combined genotype of PD1.5 and PD1 SNVs had a 1.59 (95% CI: 1.06-2.41) and a 2.97 (95% CI:1.43-6.18) more chances of evolving to death than others. Conclusion: Our data indicates: 1) The analyzed SNVs in the PDCD1 gene do not influence LSCC risk, 2) PD1, PD1.5, and PD1.9 affect LSCC location, 3) PD1 and PD1.5 influence LSCC aggressiveness, 4) BMI, ECOG, tumor stage, lack of surgical tumor resection, PD1 and PD1.5 SNVs are independent prognostic factors for OS of LSCC patients. These findings reinforce the importance of studying inherited biomarkers in oncology, which may contribute to risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches. Acknowledgements: The study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino e à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP #2019/09168-8; #2023/09738-4, and Cancer Theranostics Innovation Center, CancerThera, CEPID FAPESP #2021/10265-8).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925000495Genetic polymorphismsLaryngeal squamous cell carcinomaPDCD1PrognosisSurvival
spellingShingle Matheus Yung Perin
Daniele Daiane Affonso
Carlos Takahiro Chone
Gustavo Jacob Lourenço
Carmen Silvia Passos Lima
PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Genetic polymorphisms
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
PDCD1
Prognosis
Survival
title PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
title_full PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
title_fullStr PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
title_full_unstemmed PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
title_short PDCD1 VARIANTS ARE INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
title_sort pdcd1 variants are independent prognostic factors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
topic Genetic polymorphisms
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
PDCD1
Prognosis
Survival
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137925000495
work_keys_str_mv AT matheusyungperin pdcd1variantsareindependentprognosticfactorsinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT danieledaianeaffonso pdcd1variantsareindependentprognosticfactorsinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT carlostakahirochone pdcd1variantsareindependentprognosticfactorsinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT gustavojacoblourenco pdcd1variantsareindependentprognosticfactorsinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma
AT carmensilviapassoslima pdcd1variantsareindependentprognosticfactorsinpatientswithheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma