Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement

Abstract As virality has become increasingly central in shaping information sources’ strategies, it raises concerns about its consequences for society, particularly when referring to the impact of viral news on the public discourse. Nonetheless, there has been little consideration of whether these v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuele Sangiorgio, Niccolò Di Marco, Gabriele Etta, Matteo Cinelli, Roy Cerqueti, Walter Quattrociocchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84960-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559725360021504
author Emanuele Sangiorgio
Niccolò Di Marco
Gabriele Etta
Matteo Cinelli
Roy Cerqueti
Walter Quattrociocchi
author_facet Emanuele Sangiorgio
Niccolò Di Marco
Gabriele Etta
Matteo Cinelli
Roy Cerqueti
Walter Quattrociocchi
author_sort Emanuele Sangiorgio
collection DOAJ
description Abstract As virality has become increasingly central in shaping information sources’ strategies, it raises concerns about its consequences for society, particularly when referring to the impact of viral news on the public discourse. Nonetheless, there has been little consideration of whether these viral events genuinely boost the attention received by the source. To address this gap, we analyze content timelines from over 1000 European news outlets from 2018 to 2023 on Facebook and YouTube, employing a Bayesian structural time series model to evaluate the impact of viral posts. Our results show that most viral events do not significantly increase engagement and rarely lead to sustained growth. We identify two primary types of viral effects corresponding to different mechanisms of collective attention response. A ‘loaded-type’ virality manifests after a sustained growth phase, representing its final burst, followed by a decline in attention. A ‘sudden-type’ virality, with news emerging unexpectedly, reactivates the collective response process. Moreover, quick viral effects fade faster, while slower processes lead to more persistent growth. These findings highlight the transient nature of viral events and underscore the importance of consistent, steady attention-building strategies to establish a solid connection with the user base rather than relying on sudden visibility spikes.
format Article
id doaj-art-33bb2e9230b543c2b3a76105c1b1f8f1
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-33bb2e9230b543c2b3a76105c1b1f8f12025-01-05T12:14:07ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111110.1038/s41598-024-84960-6Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagementEmanuele Sangiorgio0Niccolò Di Marco1Gabriele Etta2Matteo Cinelli3Roy Cerqueti4Walter Quattrociocchi5Department of Social Sciences and Economics, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Social Sciences and Economics, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of RomeAbstract As virality has become increasingly central in shaping information sources’ strategies, it raises concerns about its consequences for society, particularly when referring to the impact of viral news on the public discourse. Nonetheless, there has been little consideration of whether these viral events genuinely boost the attention received by the source. To address this gap, we analyze content timelines from over 1000 European news outlets from 2018 to 2023 on Facebook and YouTube, employing a Bayesian structural time series model to evaluate the impact of viral posts. Our results show that most viral events do not significantly increase engagement and rarely lead to sustained growth. We identify two primary types of viral effects corresponding to different mechanisms of collective attention response. A ‘loaded-type’ virality manifests after a sustained growth phase, representing its final burst, followed by a decline in attention. A ‘sudden-type’ virality, with news emerging unexpectedly, reactivates the collective response process. Moreover, quick viral effects fade faster, while slower processes lead to more persistent growth. These findings highlight the transient nature of viral events and underscore the importance of consistent, steady attention-building strategies to establish a solid connection with the user base rather than relying on sudden visibility spikes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84960-6Social mediaViralityAttention economy
spellingShingle Emanuele Sangiorgio
Niccolò Di Marco
Gabriele Etta
Matteo Cinelli
Roy Cerqueti
Walter Quattrociocchi
Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
Scientific Reports
Social media
Virality
Attention economy
title Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
title_full Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
title_fullStr Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
title_short Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
title_sort evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement
topic Social media
Virality
Attention economy
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84960-6
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelesangiorgio evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement
AT niccolodimarco evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement
AT gabrieleetta evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement
AT matteocinelli evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement
AT roycerqueti evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement
AT walterquattrociocchi evaluatingtheeffectofviralpostsonsocialmediaengagement