From field to analysis: strengthening reproducibility and confirmation in research for sustainable agriculture

Abstract Lack of robustness and potential bias are growing concerns for research, including for sustainable agriculture. Research confirmation requires independent duplication of field experiments, modeling and other analyses. Key concepts include “repeatability” (consistency within an experiment),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey W. White, Kenneth J. Boote, Bruce A. Kimball, Cheryl Porter, Montse Salmeron, Vakhtang Shelia, Kelly R. Thorp, Gerrit Hoogenboom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:npj Sustainable Agriculture
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00067-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Lack of robustness and potential bias are growing concerns for research, including for sustainable agriculture. Research confirmation requires independent duplication of field experiments, modeling and other analyses. Key concepts include “repeatability” (consistency within an experiment), “replicability” (same team, different environments), and “reproducibility” (independent team, different environments). Researchers must improve workflow descriptions, especially regarding crop environments and management. A useful metric is how well research could be reproduced in ten years.
ISSN:2731-9202