Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920
Drawing upon extensive archival sources, this article examines a critical and challenging period in the history of the Foreign Diplomatic Corps of the White Movement. Despite the successive defeats experienced by the White armies within Russia, the diplomatic arm of the movement persisted in its ope...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3936 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849316925604102144 |
|---|---|
| author | E. M. Mironova |
| author_facet | E. M. Mironova |
| author_sort | E. M. Mironova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Drawing upon extensive archival sources, this article examines a critical and challenging period in the history of the Foreign Diplomatic Corps of the White Movement. Despite the successive defeats experienced by the White armies within Russia, the diplomatic arm of the movement persisted in its operations abroad. Recognizing that subordination to Soviet authorities or the transfer of diplomatic responsibilities to representatives appointed by Moscow was unacceptable, the Corps' leadership opted to maintain organizational autonomy in the event of an unfavorable outcome to the Civil War. To achieve this goal, efforts were made to restore internal hierarchy and discipline, streamline the diplomatic staff, and preserve the representational functions of Corps institutions worldwide. Securing sustainable financial support for ongoing diplomatic activities also emerged as a priority.Amid these organizational transformations, the Corps expanded its responsibilities by actively addressing the pressing needs of the rapidly growing Russian émigré community and protecting Russian assets overseas. The diplomatic leadership initiated discussions regarding legal safeguards for Russian citizens abroad, anticipating a potential defeat of the White Movement within Russia.The rise of General Baron Wrangel to power in Sevastopol provoked mixed reactions among Russian émigré circles. Despite Foreign Minister S.D. Sazonov's demonstrated loyalty to Wrangel's government, the general chose to replace him, entrusting foreign policy management to P.B. Struve. Nevertheless, Sazonov successfully positioned Ambassador M.N. Girs, the Corps' most senior diplomat based in Rome, as the head of the Diplomatic Corps. Consequently, Struve and Girs jointly shared leadership and responsibility. Under this new arrangement, the Diplomatic Corps significantly reinforced its autonomous standing, effectively transforming itself from a subordinate agency into a fully recognized partner of the central authorities. This enhanced status provided the Corps with greater prospects for continuing its diplomatic activities following the conclusion of the Civil War in Russia. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-339fa12e91aa4579be15e6ae75a54ba3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2071-8160 2541-9099 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| spelling | doaj-art-339fa12e91aa4579be15e6ae75a54ba32025-08-20T03:51:25ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992025-05-01182699810.24833/2071-8160-2025-2-101-69-982641Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920E. M. Mironova0Institute of world history RASDrawing upon extensive archival sources, this article examines a critical and challenging period in the history of the Foreign Diplomatic Corps of the White Movement. Despite the successive defeats experienced by the White armies within Russia, the diplomatic arm of the movement persisted in its operations abroad. Recognizing that subordination to Soviet authorities or the transfer of diplomatic responsibilities to representatives appointed by Moscow was unacceptable, the Corps' leadership opted to maintain organizational autonomy in the event of an unfavorable outcome to the Civil War. To achieve this goal, efforts were made to restore internal hierarchy and discipline, streamline the diplomatic staff, and preserve the representational functions of Corps institutions worldwide. Securing sustainable financial support for ongoing diplomatic activities also emerged as a priority.Amid these organizational transformations, the Corps expanded its responsibilities by actively addressing the pressing needs of the rapidly growing Russian émigré community and protecting Russian assets overseas. The diplomatic leadership initiated discussions regarding legal safeguards for Russian citizens abroad, anticipating a potential defeat of the White Movement within Russia.The rise of General Baron Wrangel to power in Sevastopol provoked mixed reactions among Russian émigré circles. Despite Foreign Minister S.D. Sazonov's demonstrated loyalty to Wrangel's government, the general chose to replace him, entrusting foreign policy management to P.B. Struve. Nevertheless, Sazonov successfully positioned Ambassador M.N. Girs, the Corps' most senior diplomat based in Rome, as the head of the Diplomatic Corps. Consequently, Struve and Girs jointly shared leadership and responsibility. Under this new arrangement, the Diplomatic Corps significantly reinforced its autonomous standing, effectively transforming itself from a subordinate agency into a fully recognized partner of the central authorities. This enhanced status provided the Corps with greater prospects for continuing its diplomatic activities following the conclusion of the Civil War in Russia.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3936white movementrussian civil warnon-bolshevik diplomacyforeign diplomatic corpsrussian emigrationsergei sazonovpyotr struvebaron wrangeldiplomatic autonomyrussian émigrés |
| spellingShingle | E. M. Mironova Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta white movement russian civil war non-bolshevik diplomacy foreign diplomatic corps russian emigration sergei sazonov pyotr struve baron wrangel diplomatic autonomy russian émigrés |
| title | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 |
| title_full | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 |
| title_fullStr | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 |
| title_short | Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy Amidst the Crisis of the White Movement: Early 1920 |
| title_sort | russian non bolshevik diplomacy amidst the crisis of the white movement early 1920 |
| topic | white movement russian civil war non-bolshevik diplomacy foreign diplomatic corps russian emigration sergei sazonov pyotr struve baron wrangel diplomatic autonomy russian émigrés |
| url | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/3936 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emmironova russiannonbolshevikdiplomacyamidstthecrisisofthewhitemovementearly1920 |