Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are a critical component for treating patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed use of Impella 5.5 device for efficacy and safety in a single-center CS population from February 2022 and April 2023. Thirty-six CS patients received Impell...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ioana Dumitru, Debbie Rinde-Hoffman, Maria Sevillano, Leeandra Schnell, Elizabeth Quintilliani, Swaroop Bommareddi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joic/7044608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850065872439214080
author Ioana Dumitru
Debbie Rinde-Hoffman
Maria Sevillano
Leeandra Schnell
Elizabeth Quintilliani
Swaroop Bommareddi
author_facet Ioana Dumitru
Debbie Rinde-Hoffman
Maria Sevillano
Leeandra Schnell
Elizabeth Quintilliani
Swaroop Bommareddi
author_sort Ioana Dumitru
collection DOAJ
description Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are a critical component for treating patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed use of Impella 5.5 device for efficacy and safety in a single-center CS population from February 2022 and April 2023. Thirty-six CS patients received Impella 5.5 support for a median duration of 16 (2, 63) days, during a median hospital stay of 40 (4, 97) days, with an overall survival (OS) of 69%. While 18 patients received Impella 5.5 only, 11 patients received Impella 5.5 as part of a de-escalation strategy, and 7 patients escalated from Impella CP only to Impella 5.5. At the time of implant, creatinine was 1.5 (0.6, 5.2) mg/dL and normalized to 1.1 (0.6, 7.7) mg/dL at discharge. In a subset of CS transfer patients (n = 12), median duration of support was 16 (1, 31) days, duration of hospital stay was 43 (8, 88) days, and OS was 67% (8/12). Collectively, these data demonstrate that Impella 5.5 support is safe and effectively improves laboratory values and survival outcomes in both transfer and in-house patients with CS.
format Article
id doaj-art-337d7bf25ad0487b924c5d833a7c872d
institution DOAJ
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-337d7bf25ad0487b924c5d833a7c872d2025-08-20T02:48:54ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832024-01-01202410.1155/joic/7044608Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock PatientsIoana Dumitru0Debbie Rinde-Hoffman1Maria Sevillano2Leeandra Schnell3Elizabeth Quintilliani4Swaroop Bommareddi5Division of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac TransplantDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac TransplantDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac TransplantDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac TransplantAbiomedDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac TransplantTemporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are a critical component for treating patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We analyzed use of Impella 5.5 device for efficacy and safety in a single-center CS population from February 2022 and April 2023. Thirty-six CS patients received Impella 5.5 support for a median duration of 16 (2, 63) days, during a median hospital stay of 40 (4, 97) days, with an overall survival (OS) of 69%. While 18 patients received Impella 5.5 only, 11 patients received Impella 5.5 as part of a de-escalation strategy, and 7 patients escalated from Impella CP only to Impella 5.5. At the time of implant, creatinine was 1.5 (0.6, 5.2) mg/dL and normalized to 1.1 (0.6, 7.7) mg/dL at discharge. In a subset of CS transfer patients (n = 12), median duration of support was 16 (1, 31) days, duration of hospital stay was 43 (8, 88) days, and OS was 67% (8/12). Collectively, these data demonstrate that Impella 5.5 support is safe and effectively improves laboratory values and survival outcomes in both transfer and in-house patients with CS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joic/7044608
spellingShingle Ioana Dumitru
Debbie Rinde-Hoffman
Maria Sevillano
Leeandra Schnell
Elizabeth Quintilliani
Swaroop Bommareddi
Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_full Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_fullStr Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_full_unstemmed Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_short Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients
title_sort single center experience with impella 5 5 for escalation and de escalation of cardiogenic shock patients
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joic/7044608
work_keys_str_mv AT ioanadumitru singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients
AT debbierindehoffman singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients
AT mariasevillano singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients
AT leeandraschnell singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients
AT elizabethquintilliani singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients
AT swaroopbommareddi singlecenterexperiencewithimpella55forescalationanddeescalationofcardiogenicshockpatients