Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources
Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī al-Taḥtānī (d. 766/1365) was one of a triumvirate of scholars allegedly associated with Shīʿism – the other two being al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 726/1325) and Badr al-Dīn al-Tustarī (d. 732/1332) – who played an important role in shaping and transmitting Avicennan thought. rough the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Bilim Tarihi Enstitüsü
2019-11-01
|
| Series: | Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/11-cilt-5-sayi-2/5-m0072/rapoport_en.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849305964769968128 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael A. Rapoport |
| author_facet | Michael A. Rapoport |
| author_sort | Michael A. Rapoport |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī al-Taḥtānī (d. 766/1365) was one of a triumvirate of scholars allegedly associated with Shīʿism – the other two being al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 726/1325) and Badr al-Dīn al-Tustarī (d. 732/1332) – who played an important role in shaping and transmitting Avicennan thought. rough their adjudicative commentaries on Ibn Sīnā’s (d. 428/1037) al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, al-Taḥtānī, al-Ḥillī, and al-Tustarī created a narrative that pitted Sunnī scholars critical of Ibn Sīnā and Avicennism – exemplified by Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210) – in opposition to their Twelver Shīʿī defenders and interpreters – exemplified by Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 672/1274). This understanding of post-Avicennan Arabic and Islamic philosophy is informed by the assumption that these three scholars were all, in fact, Shīʿīs. Many bio-bibliographical sources, however, claim that al-Taḥtānī was not. This article examines the sources for his life, paying particular attention to the question of his sectarian a liation. It reveals that Sunnī and Shīʿī scholars relied on different sources for and relayed different information about al-Taḥtānī’s life. Ultimately, it claims that the evidence suggests that he was a Sunnī. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3378385336554ea8a505190bbb1bcd69 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2547-9415 2547-9415 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
| publisher | İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Bilim Tarihi Enstitüsü |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-3378385336554ea8a505190bbb1bcd692025-08-20T03:55:15Zengİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Bilim Tarihi EnstitüsüNazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences2547-94152547-94152019-11-015211914210.12658/Nazariyat.5.2.M0072enWas Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical SourcesMichael A. Rapoport0Florida Atlantic UniversityQuṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī al-Taḥtānī (d. 766/1365) was one of a triumvirate of scholars allegedly associated with Shīʿism – the other two being al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 726/1325) and Badr al-Dīn al-Tustarī (d. 732/1332) – who played an important role in shaping and transmitting Avicennan thought. rough their adjudicative commentaries on Ibn Sīnā’s (d. 428/1037) al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, al-Taḥtānī, al-Ḥillī, and al-Tustarī created a narrative that pitted Sunnī scholars critical of Ibn Sīnā and Avicennism – exemplified by Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210) – in opposition to their Twelver Shīʿī defenders and interpreters – exemplified by Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 672/1274). This understanding of post-Avicennan Arabic and Islamic philosophy is informed by the assumption that these three scholars were all, in fact, Shīʿīs. Many bio-bibliographical sources, however, claim that al-Taḥtānī was not. This article examines the sources for his life, paying particular attention to the question of his sectarian a liation. It reveals that Sunnī and Shīʿī scholars relied on different sources for and relayed different information about al-Taḥtānī’s life. Ultimately, it claims that the evidence suggests that he was a Sunnī.https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/11-cilt-5-sayi-2/5-m0072/rapoport_en.pdfquṭb al-dīn al-rāzī al-taḥtānīphilosophypostclassical eraavicennismbiographical dictionaries |
| spellingShingle | Michael A. Rapoport Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences quṭb al-dīn al-rāzī al-taḥtānī philosophy postclassical era avicennism biographical dictionaries |
| title | Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources |
| title_full | Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources |
| title_fullStr | Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources |
| title_full_unstemmed | Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources |
| title_short | Was Qutb al-Din al-Razi al-Tahtani a Sunni or a Shi‘i?: An Examination of Bio-bibliographical Sources |
| title_sort | was qutb al din al razi al tahtani a sunni or a shi i an examination of bio bibliographical sources |
| topic | quṭb al-dīn al-rāzī al-taḥtānī philosophy postclassical era avicennism biographical dictionaries |
| url | https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/11-cilt-5-sayi-2/5-m0072/rapoport_en.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelarapoport wasqutbaldinalrazialtahtaniasunniorashiianexaminationofbiobibliographicalsources |