Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center

Abstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianyu Li, Liangbo Dong, Dongming Zhang, Jiashu Han, Menghua Dai, Junchao Guo, Qiang Xu, Weibin Wang, Xianlin Han, Chen Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861951246106624
author Tianyu Li
Liangbo Dong
Dongming Zhang
Jiashu Han
Menghua Dai
Junchao Guo
Qiang Xu
Weibin Wang
Xianlin Han
Chen Lin
author_facet Tianyu Li
Liangbo Dong
Dongming Zhang
Jiashu Han
Menghua Dai
Junchao Guo
Qiang Xu
Weibin Wang
Xianlin Han
Chen Lin
author_sort Tianyu Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This study aims to explore the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD with or without HAV and CR-HAV. Methods We enrolled 267 consecutive patients who underwent MIPD at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January and December 2023. HAV was identified preoperatively through enhanced abdominal CT and three-dimensional reconstruction, and classified according to the Michels and Hiatt systems. Clinically relevant hepatic artery variations (CR-HAV) were defined based on their potential impact on the surgical approach. We collected and analyzed perioperative data and oncological outcomes between patients with and without HAV and CR-HAV. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize baseline confounding. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results HAV was identified in 26.1% of patients, and CR-HAV in 18.9%. The median operation time was significantly longer in HAV (+) group compared to HAV (-) group (6.72 vs. 5.80 h, p = 0.013). No significant differences were found between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups regarding intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications, surgical mortality, length of stay, re-operation, and re-admission. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups in the malignant cohort. Conclusion HAV and CR-HAV do not significantly impact overall or progression-free survival in patients undergoing MIPD. While HAV is associated with longer operation times, other perioperative and oncological outcomes remain comparable between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups.
format Article
id doaj-art-33391c74a9104ccea0291485743fd41b
institution Kabale University
issn 1477-7819
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj-art-33391c74a9104ccea0291485743fd41b2025-02-09T12:39:53ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192025-02-0123111010.1186/s12957-025-03704-6Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic centerTianyu Li0Liangbo Dong1Dongming Zhang2Jiashu Han3Menghua Dai4Junchao Guo5Qiang Xu6Weibin Wang7Xianlin Han8Chen Lin9Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, Baotou Central HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeAbstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This study aims to explore the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD with or without HAV and CR-HAV. Methods We enrolled 267 consecutive patients who underwent MIPD at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January and December 2023. HAV was identified preoperatively through enhanced abdominal CT and three-dimensional reconstruction, and classified according to the Michels and Hiatt systems. Clinically relevant hepatic artery variations (CR-HAV) were defined based on their potential impact on the surgical approach. We collected and analyzed perioperative data and oncological outcomes between patients with and without HAV and CR-HAV. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize baseline confounding. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results HAV was identified in 26.1% of patients, and CR-HAV in 18.9%. The median operation time was significantly longer in HAV (+) group compared to HAV (-) group (6.72 vs. 5.80 h, p = 0.013). No significant differences were found between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups regarding intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications, surgical mortality, length of stay, re-operation, and re-admission. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups in the malignant cohort. Conclusion HAV and CR-HAV do not significantly impact overall or progression-free survival in patients undergoing MIPD. While HAV is associated with longer operation times, other perioperative and oncological outcomes remain comparable between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6Hepatic artery variationMinimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic surgeryOverall survivalProgression-free survivalSurgical outcomes
spellingShingle Tianyu Li
Liangbo Dong
Dongming Zhang
Jiashu Han
Menghua Dai
Junchao Guo
Qiang Xu
Weibin Wang
Xianlin Han
Chen Lin
Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Hepatic artery variation
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy
Robotic surgery
Overall survival
Progression-free survival
Surgical outcomes
title Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
title_full Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
title_fullStr Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
title_short Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
title_sort evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy insights from 2023 data at a high volume pancreatic center
topic Hepatic artery variation
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy
Robotic surgery
Overall survival
Progression-free survival
Surgical outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyuli evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT liangbodong evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT dongmingzhang evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT jiashuhan evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT menghuadai evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT junchaoguo evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT qiangxu evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT weibinwang evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT xianlinhan evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter
AT chenlin evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter