Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center
Abstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-02-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823861951246106624 |
---|---|
author | Tianyu Li Liangbo Dong Dongming Zhang Jiashu Han Menghua Dai Junchao Guo Qiang Xu Weibin Wang Xianlin Han Chen Lin |
author_facet | Tianyu Li Liangbo Dong Dongming Zhang Jiashu Han Menghua Dai Junchao Guo Qiang Xu Weibin Wang Xianlin Han Chen Lin |
author_sort | Tianyu Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This study aims to explore the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD with or without HAV and CR-HAV. Methods We enrolled 267 consecutive patients who underwent MIPD at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January and December 2023. HAV was identified preoperatively through enhanced abdominal CT and three-dimensional reconstruction, and classified according to the Michels and Hiatt systems. Clinically relevant hepatic artery variations (CR-HAV) were defined based on their potential impact on the surgical approach. We collected and analyzed perioperative data and oncological outcomes between patients with and without HAV and CR-HAV. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize baseline confounding. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results HAV was identified in 26.1% of patients, and CR-HAV in 18.9%. The median operation time was significantly longer in HAV (+) group compared to HAV (-) group (6.72 vs. 5.80 h, p = 0.013). No significant differences were found between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups regarding intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications, surgical mortality, length of stay, re-operation, and re-admission. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups in the malignant cohort. Conclusion HAV and CR-HAV do not significantly impact overall or progression-free survival in patients undergoing MIPD. While HAV is associated with longer operation times, other perioperative and oncological outcomes remain comparable between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-33391c74a9104ccea0291485743fd41b |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1477-7819 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
spelling | doaj-art-33391c74a9104ccea0291485743fd41b2025-02-09T12:39:53ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192025-02-0123111010.1186/s12957-025-03704-6Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic centerTianyu Li0Liangbo Dong1Dongming Zhang2Jiashu Han3Menghua Dai4Junchao Guo5Qiang Xu6Weibin Wang7Xianlin Han8Chen Lin9Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, Baotou Central HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeAbstract Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has seen increased adoption due to advancements in surgical techniques and technology. However, the impact of hepatic artery variations (HAV) and clinically relevant HAV (CR-HAV) on MIPD outcomes remains under-investigated. This study aims to explore the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD with or without HAV and CR-HAV. Methods We enrolled 267 consecutive patients who underwent MIPD at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January and December 2023. HAV was identified preoperatively through enhanced abdominal CT and three-dimensional reconstruction, and classified according to the Michels and Hiatt systems. Clinically relevant hepatic artery variations (CR-HAV) were defined based on their potential impact on the surgical approach. We collected and analyzed perioperative data and oncological outcomes between patients with and without HAV and CR-HAV. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize baseline confounding. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results HAV was identified in 26.1% of patients, and CR-HAV in 18.9%. The median operation time was significantly longer in HAV (+) group compared to HAV (-) group (6.72 vs. 5.80 h, p = 0.013). No significant differences were found between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups regarding intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complications, surgical mortality, length of stay, re-operation, and re-admission. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups in the malignant cohort. Conclusion HAV and CR-HAV do not significantly impact overall or progression-free survival in patients undergoing MIPD. While HAV is associated with longer operation times, other perioperative and oncological outcomes remain comparable between HAV/CR-HAV (+) and (-) groups.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6Hepatic artery variationMinimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic surgeryOverall survivalProgression-free survivalSurgical outcomes |
spellingShingle | Tianyu Li Liangbo Dong Dongming Zhang Jiashu Han Menghua Dai Junchao Guo Qiang Xu Weibin Wang Xianlin Han Chen Lin Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center World Journal of Surgical Oncology Hepatic artery variation Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Robotic surgery Overall survival Progression-free survival Surgical outcomes |
title | Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center |
title_full | Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center |
title_short | Evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: insights from 2023 data at a high-volume pancreatic center |
title_sort | evaluating the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic artery variations in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy insights from 2023 data at a high volume pancreatic center |
topic | Hepatic artery variation Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Robotic surgery Overall survival Progression-free survival Surgical outcomes |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03704-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianyuli evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT liangbodong evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT dongmingzhang evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT jiashuhan evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT menghuadai evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT junchaoguo evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT qiangxu evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT weibinwang evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT xianlinhan evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter AT chenlin evaluatingthesurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesofhepaticarteryvariationsinminimallyinvasivepancreaticoduodenectomyinsightsfrom2023dataatahighvolumepancreaticcenter |