SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS
Methods that allow to systematize the accumulated information on specifically formulated questions, analyze it and make reliable findings are of great interest and popularity with the emergence of a huge number of studies and publications in various fields of medicine, a significant increase in info...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Столичная издательская компания
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1236 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849227710672404480 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu. V. Lukina S. Yu. Martsevich N. P. Kutishenko |
| author_facet | Yu. V. Lukina S. Yu. Martsevich N. P. Kutishenko |
| author_sort | Yu. V. Lukina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Methods that allow to systematize the accumulated information on specifically formulated questions, analyze it and make reliable findings are of great interest and popularity with the emergence of a huge number of studies and publications in various fields of medicine, a significant increase in information, failure to identify weak effects in the individual studies. The use of systematic reviews and high-quality meta-analysis is an analytical basis of evidence-based medicine, it is a very valuable tool for decision-making at the level of practitioner, health care leaders and experts in the preparation of guidelines and legislation concerning the use of the most effective and safe treatments, when planning future research, in the development of rational health policy. Features of methods of systematic review and meta-analysis and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed in the article. The authors present the historical facts of occurrence of the Cochrane Collaboration, whose main task is to systematize and analyze accumulated information from a variety of medical research. The contribution of Russian researchers into this field of medical science is also assessed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3321f45b193248d39cf75838db45bb79 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1819-6446 2225-3653 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | Столичная издательская компания |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии |
| spelling | doaj-art-3321f45b193248d39cf75838db45bb792025-08-23T10:00:26ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532016-05-0112218018510.20996/1819-6446-2016-12-2-180-1851203SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODSYu. V. Lukina0S. Yu. Martsevich1N. P. Kutishenko2State Research Center for Preventive Medicine, MoscowState Research Center for Preventive Medicine, MoscowState Research Center for Preventive Medicine, MoscowMethods that allow to systematize the accumulated information on specifically formulated questions, analyze it and make reliable findings are of great interest and popularity with the emergence of a huge number of studies and publications in various fields of medicine, a significant increase in information, failure to identify weak effects in the individual studies. The use of systematic reviews and high-quality meta-analysis is an analytical basis of evidence-based medicine, it is a very valuable tool for decision-making at the level of practitioner, health care leaders and experts in the preparation of guidelines and legislation concerning the use of the most effective and safe treatments, when planning future research, in the development of rational health policy. Features of methods of systematic review and meta-analysis and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed in the article. The authors present the historical facts of occurrence of the Cochrane Collaboration, whose main task is to systematize and analyze accumulated information from a variety of medical research. The contribution of Russian researchers into this field of medical science is also assessed.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1236systematic reviewmeta-analysisa scientific paper |
| spellingShingle | Yu. V. Lukina S. Yu. Martsevich N. P. Kutishenko SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии systematic review meta-analysis a scientific paper |
| title | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS |
| title_full | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS |
| title_fullStr | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS |
| title_full_unstemmed | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS |
| title_short | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: PITFALLS OF METHODS |
| title_sort | systematic review and meta analysis pitfalls of methods |
| topic | systematic review meta-analysis a scientific paper |
| url | https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1236 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yuvlukina systematicreviewandmetaanalysispitfallsofmethods AT syumartsevich systematicreviewandmetaanalysispitfallsofmethods AT npkutishenko systematicreviewandmetaanalysispitfallsofmethods |