Promoting engagement with social fact-checks online: Investigating the roles of social connection and shared partisanship.
Social corrections - where users correct each other - can help rectify inaccurate beliefs. However, social corrections are often ignored. Here we ask under what conditions social corrections promote engagement from corrected users, allowing for greater insight into how users respond to debunking mes...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Cameron Martel, Mohsen Mosleh, Dean Eckles, David G Rand |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319336 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Promoting engagement with social fact-checks online: Investigating the roles of social connection and shared partisanship
by: Cameron Martel, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The fact-checking dilemma: Fact-checking increases the reputation of the fact-checker but creates perceptions of ideological bias
by: Natalia Aruguete, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Partisanship and Risk Talk on Twitter
by: Yini Zhang, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Fact-checking of health information on social networking sites: The moderating role of gender
by: Jiabei Xia, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Political partisanship, trait empathy, and social justice concerns in a representative sample of Californians
by: Andres G. Martinez
Published: (2025-04-01)