Investigation of Skin–Stringer Assembly Made with Adhesive and Mechanical Methods on Aircraft
New assembly methods for aircraft structural parts, such as skins and stringers, are being investigated to address issues like galvanic corrosion, stress concentration, and weight. For this, many researchers are examining the mechanical and fracture properties of adhesively bonded parts through expe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Aerospace |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/5/383 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | New assembly methods for aircraft structural parts, such as skins and stringers, are being investigated to address issues like galvanic corrosion, stress concentration, and weight. For this, many researchers are examining the mechanical and fracture properties of adhesively bonded parts through experimental testing and numerical modelling methods, including Cohesive Zone Modelling (CZM), Compliance-Based Beam Method (CBBM), Double Cantilever Beam (DCB), and End Notched Flexural (ENF) tests. In this study, similarly, DCB and ENF tests were conducted on skin and beam parts bonded with AF163-2K adhesive using CBBM and then modelled and analysed in ABAQUS CAE 2018 software. Four different skin–stringer connection models were analysed, respectively, using only adhesive, only rivets, both adhesive and rivets, and also a reduced number of rivets in the adhesively bonded joint. This study found that adhesive increased initial strength, while rivets improved strength after the adhesive began to crack. Using a hybrid connection that combines both rivets and adhesive has been observed to enhance the overall strength and durability of the assembly. Then, experimental results were compared, and four numerical models for skin–stringer connections (adhesive only, rivets only, adhesive and rivets, and adhesive with reduced rivets) were analysed and discussed. In this context, the results were supported and reported with graphs, tables, and analysis images. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2226-4310 |