Call and Response

A "housing crisis" is often naively understood as a simple market imbalance between supply and demand, frequently occurring within cities in a capitalist mode of development. If that were the case, the solution would be to simply open the pipes and build more houses, a regulatory action d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jesse Foster Honsa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft OPEN Publishing 2022-05-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/footprint/article/view/5386
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545293060538368
author Jesse Foster Honsa
author_facet Jesse Foster Honsa
author_sort Jesse Foster Honsa
collection DOAJ
description A "housing crisis" is often naively understood as a simple market imbalance between supply and demand, frequently occurring within cities in a capitalist mode of development. If that were the case, the solution would be to simply open the pipes and build more houses, a regulatory action delegated to technocrats. But as Reinhardt Koselleck reveals, crisis is a concept constructed by special interest groups with the aim of challenging absolute power, enlarging a sphere of popular criticism towards business-as-usual. This paper considers the operative nature of 'housing crisis' and related terms by investigating their use as a tool for urban reform in the 19th and 20th centuries in London. In newspaper articles, think tank publications and government reports, criticism often took on qualitative dimensions, leveraging change to housing practices. Crisis itself has had different meanings, from a moral apocalypse to a political risk to an historic opportunity. This is in contrast to how the term is used today, where it is no longer a climactic moment of decision and relief, but a perpetual and seemingly unsurmountable condition. While London's housing crisis is today universally accepted according to experts' statistics, it is rarely addressed on popular aesthetic grounds.
format Article
id doaj-art-32fb4f8902424faa982779056e24cd46
institution Kabale University
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
language English
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher TU Delft OPEN Publishing
record_format Article
series Footprint
spelling doaj-art-32fb4f8902424faa982779056e24cd462025-02-03T07:26:17ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-15041875-14902022-05-0115210.7480/footprint.15.2.5386Call and ResponseJesse Foster Honsa0KU Leuven A "housing crisis" is often naively understood as a simple market imbalance between supply and demand, frequently occurring within cities in a capitalist mode of development. If that were the case, the solution would be to simply open the pipes and build more houses, a regulatory action delegated to technocrats. But as Reinhardt Koselleck reveals, crisis is a concept constructed by special interest groups with the aim of challenging absolute power, enlarging a sphere of popular criticism towards business-as-usual. This paper considers the operative nature of 'housing crisis' and related terms by investigating their use as a tool for urban reform in the 19th and 20th centuries in London. In newspaper articles, think tank publications and government reports, criticism often took on qualitative dimensions, leveraging change to housing practices. Crisis itself has had different meanings, from a moral apocalypse to a political risk to an historic opportunity. This is in contrast to how the term is used today, where it is no longer a climactic moment of decision and relief, but a perpetual and seemingly unsurmountable condition. While London's housing crisis is today universally accepted according to experts' statistics, it is rarely addressed on popular aesthetic grounds. https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/footprint/article/view/5386
spellingShingle Jesse Foster Honsa
Call and Response
Footprint
title Call and Response
title_full Call and Response
title_fullStr Call and Response
title_full_unstemmed Call and Response
title_short Call and Response
title_sort call and response
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/footprint/article/view/5386
work_keys_str_mv AT jessefosterhonsa callandresponse