Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research

Abstract In the article “Comparison of rhythm and rate control medications for new-onset atrial fibrillation in septic patients: MIMIC-IV database analysis”, Weng et al. used ICD-9/ICD-10 codes to define sepsis. However, we suggest that using the Sepsis-3.0 criteria, which incorporates SOFA scoring...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangdong Wang, Yaxin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Translational Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06612-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849343304274018304
author Guangdong Wang
Yaxin Zhang
author_facet Guangdong Wang
Yaxin Zhang
author_sort Guangdong Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the article “Comparison of rhythm and rate control medications for new-onset atrial fibrillation in septic patients: MIMIC-IV database analysis”, Weng et al. used ICD-9/ICD-10 codes to define sepsis. However, we suggest that using the Sepsis-3.0 criteria, which incorporates SOFA scoring and infection evidence, would provide a more accurate diagnosis. The MIMIC-IV database offers a derived table based on Sepsis-3.0, which could improve cohort definition and enhance the study’s clinical relevance. We recommend that future research adopt Sepsis-3.0 or perform sensitivity analyses to improve result robustness.
format Article
id doaj-art-32e52d11b83e42fa8f2865fd50608ba6
institution Kabale University
issn 1479-5876
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Translational Medicine
spelling doaj-art-32e52d11b83e42fa8f2865fd50608ba62025-08-20T03:43:02ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762025-07-012311210.1186/s12967-025-06612-1Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based researchGuangdong Wang0Yaxin Zhang1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityAbstract In the article “Comparison of rhythm and rate control medications for new-onset atrial fibrillation in septic patients: MIMIC-IV database analysis”, Weng et al. used ICD-9/ICD-10 codes to define sepsis. However, we suggest that using the Sepsis-3.0 criteria, which incorporates SOFA scoring and infection evidence, would provide a more accurate diagnosis. The MIMIC-IV database offers a derived table based on Sepsis-3.0, which could improve cohort definition and enhance the study’s clinical relevance. We recommend that future research adopt Sepsis-3.0 or perform sensitivity analyses to improve result robustness.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06612-1
spellingShingle Guangdong Wang
Yaxin Zhang
Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
Journal of Translational Medicine
title Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
title_full Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
title_fullStr Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
title_full_unstemmed Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
title_short Concerns regarding sepsis identification using ICD codes in MIMIC-IV based research
title_sort concerns regarding sepsis identification using icd codes in mimic iv based research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06612-1
work_keys_str_mv AT guangdongwang concernsregardingsepsisidentificationusingicdcodesinmimicivbasedresearch
AT yaxinzhang concernsregardingsepsisidentificationusingicdcodesinmimicivbasedresearch