A Deep Learning Method for Photovoltaic Power Generation Forecasting Based on a Time-Series Dense Encoder
Deep learning has become a widely used approach in photovoltaic (PV) power generation forecasting due to its strong self-learning and parameter optimization capabilities. In this study, we apply a deep learning algorithm, known as the time-series dense encoder (TiDE), which is an MLP-based encoder–d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2434 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Deep learning has become a widely used approach in photovoltaic (PV) power generation forecasting due to its strong self-learning and parameter optimization capabilities. In this study, we apply a deep learning algorithm, known as the time-series dense encoder (TiDE), which is an MLP-based encoder–decoder model, to forecast PV power generation. TiDE compresses historical time series and covariates into latent representations via residual connections and reconstructs future values through a temporal decoder, capturing both long- and short-term dependencies. We trained the model using data from 2020 to 2022 from Australia’s Desert Knowledge Australia Solar Centre (DKASC), with 2023 data used for testing. Forecast accuracy was evaluated using the <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula> coefficient of determination, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). In the 5 min ahead forecasting test, TiDE demonstrated high short-term accuracy with an <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula> of 0.952, MAE of 0.150, and RMSE of 0.349, though performance declines for longer horizons, such as the 1 h ahead forecast, compared to other algorithms. For one-day-ahead forecasts, it achieved an <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula> of 0.712, an MAE of 0.507, and an RMSE of 0.856, effectively capturing medium-term weather trends but showing limited responsiveness to sudden weather changes. Further analysis indicated improved performance in cloudy and rainy weather, and seasonal analysis reveals higher accuracy in spring and autumn, with reduced accuracy in summer and winter due to extreme conditions. Additionally, we explore the TiDE model’s sensitivity to input environmental variables, algorithmic versatility, and the implications of forecasting errors on PV grid integration. These findings highlight TiDE’s superior forecasting accuracy and robust adaptability across weather conditions, while also revealing its limitations under abrupt changes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1996-1073 |