Energy Implications and Environmental Analysis of Oil Rigs Decommissioning Options Using LCA Methodology
The decommissioning of offshore oil rigs presents complex environmental challenges and opportunities, particularly in the context of energy transition goals and marine ecosystem protection. This study applies a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the energy and environmental impacts ass...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3372 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The decommissioning of offshore oil rigs presents complex environmental challenges and opportunities, particularly in the context of energy transition goals and marine ecosystem protection. This study applies a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the energy and environmental impacts associated with two different decommissioning approaches: full removal and partial removal. The analysis considers greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, material recovery, and long-term waste management. The study demonstrates important energy savings through the recovery and recycling of steel, which offsets energy-intensive operations such as cutting and marine transport. In addition, the analysis underscores the potential of integrating decommissioned infrastructure into offshore renewable energy systems, highlighting synergies with circular economy principles and the decarbonization of offshore operations. The findings highlight the importance of site-specific assessments and integrated policy frameworks to guide environmentally sound decommissioning decisions in offshore energy infrastructure. The analysis shows that full removal results in 14,300 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq emissions during cutting and transport, compared to 3090 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq for partial removal. Meanwhile, steel recycling generates environmental benefits of −3.80 × 10<sup>6</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq for full removal and −1.17 × 10<sup>6</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq for partial removal. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1996-1073 |