Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data
Background Evidence on the impact of diverse healthcare insurance arrangements on healthcare variation is limited in low-income and middle-income countries. In Thailand, the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), Social Health Insurance (SHI) and Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) have different...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Public Health |
| Online Access: | https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/3/2/e001264.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849235280522903552 |
|---|---|
| author | Ipek Gurol-Urganci Jan van der Meulen Anne Mills Woranan Witthayapipopsakul Orawan Anupraiwan Gumpanart Veerakul |
| author_facet | Ipek Gurol-Urganci Jan van der Meulen Anne Mills Woranan Witthayapipopsakul Orawan Anupraiwan Gumpanart Veerakul |
| author_sort | Ipek Gurol-Urganci |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background Evidence on the impact of diverse healthcare insurance arrangements on healthcare variation is limited in low-income and middle-income countries. In Thailand, the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), Social Health Insurance (SHI) and Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) have different provider choice and reimbursement arrangements and cover different populations. We explored to what extent use of revascularisation in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) varied by insurance scheme.Methods We used claims data, including all admissions for patients with STEMI between 2015 and 2020. Outcomes were any type of revascularisation, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and mortality. Regression models were used to estimate absolute differences (ADs) by scheme, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and admission year.Results Of 98 142 patients, 75.7% were covered by UCS, 13.3% by CSMBS and 11.0% by SHI. Overall, 76.3% underwent revascularisation and 53.8% received PPCI. Mortality rates were 13.2% in-hospital and 20.7% at 180 days. Compared with UCS, use of revascularisation was slightly higher with CSMBS and slightly lower with SHI (AD: CSMBS 1.3% (95% CI −0.2 to 2.8), SHI −0.8% (−2.6 to 1.0), p=0.0264) and use of PPCI was slightly higher with CSMBS and SHI (AD: CSMBS 2.4% (−0.3 to 5.2), SHI 5.2% (3.1 to 7.2), p<0.0001)). CSMBS and SHI-insured patients had lower mortality compared with UCS (AD for in-hospital: CSMBS −1.3% (−2.1 to –0.5), SHI −0.9% (−1.8 to −0.1), p<0.0001; AD for 180-day mortality: CSMBS −4.5% (−5.3 to –3.6), SHI −1.9% (−3.0 to −0.8), p<0.0001). Effects of insurance scheme varied by hospital type for all outcomes (p for interaction<0.0001).Conclusion Three-quarters of patients with STEMI received coronary revascularisation, suggesting potential undertreatment. We identified relatively small differences in access to revascularisation by insurance scheme which are unlikely to explain the lower mortality with CSMBS and SHI. Claims data can be used to assess the impact of insurance on access to effective treatments. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-326c7dc78ac14518bf460c857a32fd47 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2753-4294 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-326c7dc78ac14518bf460c857a32fd472025-08-20T04:02:50ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Public Health2753-42942025-08-013210.1136/bmjph-2024-001264Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims dataIpek Gurol-Urganci0Jan van der Meulen1Anne Mills2Woranan Witthayapipopsakul3Orawan Anupraiwan4Gumpanart Veerakul5Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKCentral Chest Institute of Thailand, Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, ThailandBangkok Heart Hospital, Bangkok, Bangkok, ThailandBackground Evidence on the impact of diverse healthcare insurance arrangements on healthcare variation is limited in low-income and middle-income countries. In Thailand, the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), Social Health Insurance (SHI) and Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) have different provider choice and reimbursement arrangements and cover different populations. We explored to what extent use of revascularisation in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) varied by insurance scheme.Methods We used claims data, including all admissions for patients with STEMI between 2015 and 2020. Outcomes were any type of revascularisation, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and mortality. Regression models were used to estimate absolute differences (ADs) by scheme, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and admission year.Results Of 98 142 patients, 75.7% were covered by UCS, 13.3% by CSMBS and 11.0% by SHI. Overall, 76.3% underwent revascularisation and 53.8% received PPCI. Mortality rates were 13.2% in-hospital and 20.7% at 180 days. Compared with UCS, use of revascularisation was slightly higher with CSMBS and slightly lower with SHI (AD: CSMBS 1.3% (95% CI −0.2 to 2.8), SHI −0.8% (−2.6 to 1.0), p=0.0264) and use of PPCI was slightly higher with CSMBS and SHI (AD: CSMBS 2.4% (−0.3 to 5.2), SHI 5.2% (3.1 to 7.2), p<0.0001)). CSMBS and SHI-insured patients had lower mortality compared with UCS (AD for in-hospital: CSMBS −1.3% (−2.1 to –0.5), SHI −0.9% (−1.8 to −0.1), p<0.0001; AD for 180-day mortality: CSMBS −4.5% (−5.3 to –3.6), SHI −1.9% (−3.0 to −0.8), p<0.0001). Effects of insurance scheme varied by hospital type for all outcomes (p for interaction<0.0001).Conclusion Three-quarters of patients with STEMI received coronary revascularisation, suggesting potential undertreatment. We identified relatively small differences in access to revascularisation by insurance scheme which are unlikely to explain the lower mortality with CSMBS and SHI. Claims data can be used to assess the impact of insurance on access to effective treatments.https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/3/2/e001264.full |
| spellingShingle | Ipek Gurol-Urganci Jan van der Meulen Anne Mills Woranan Witthayapipopsakul Orawan Anupraiwan Gumpanart Veerakul Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data BMJ Public Health |
| title | Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| title_full | Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| title_fullStr | Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| title_short | Variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in Thailand: an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| title_sort | variation in coronary revascularisation and mortality after myocardial infarction across three public health insurance schemes in thailand an observational analysis from nationwide claims data |
| url | https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/3/2/e001264.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ipekgurolurganci variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata AT janvandermeulen variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata AT annemills variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata AT worananwitthayapipopsakul variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata AT orawananupraiwan variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata AT gumpanartveerakul variationincoronaryrevascularisationandmortalityaftermyocardialinfarctionacrossthreepublichealthinsuranceschemesinthailandanobservationalanalysisfromnationwideclaimsdata |