Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef

Beef was soaked in an ultrasonic-assisted water-holding agent to increase its water-holding capacity without sacrificing its quality. Storage at -18 °C for 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the effects of the water-holding agent and ultrasound on the quality of the beef were discussed, along with the centri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Wu, Yuting Tao, Shanshan Ding, Jing Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:Food Chemistry Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772753X24002521
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850107436553207808
author Jie Wu
Yuting Tao
Shanshan Ding
Jing Xu
author_facet Jie Wu
Yuting Tao
Shanshan Ding
Jing Xu
author_sort Jie Wu
collection DOAJ
description Beef was soaked in an ultrasonic-assisted water-holding agent to increase its water-holding capacity without sacrificing its quality. Storage at -18 °C for 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the effects of the water-holding agent and ultrasound on the quality of the beef were discussed, along with the centrifugal loss rate, pH, texture, water distribution, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and other indexes. The centrifugal loss of the control group was found to be 14.33 %, while the chitosan treatment had the lowest centrifugal loss. The centrifugal losses of compound phosphate, soybean dietary fiber, and chitosan were found to be 10.77 %, 11.86 %, and 12.10 %, respectively, over the 28-days freezing time. Furthermore, there was less water migration and a lower free water P22 value in the chitosan and compound phosphate treatment groups, indicating improved water maintenance capabilities. The highest TBARS value in the control group was 1.17 mg/kg, and the lowest value of compound phosphate was 0.91 mg/kg, indicating that the compound phosphate had a good effect on lipid peroxidation. The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the water-holding properties of water-holding agents in frozen beef and serve as a guide for using these agents in the food industry.
format Article
id doaj-art-326bd90113404affbab3d8b62b465da0
institution OA Journals
issn 2772-753X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Food Chemistry Advances
spelling doaj-art-326bd90113404affbab3d8b62b465da02025-08-20T02:38:35ZengElsevierFood Chemistry Advances2772-753X2024-12-01510085710.1016/j.focha.2024.100857Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beefJie Wu0Yuting Tao1Shanshan Ding2Jing Xu3Anhui Vocational College of Grain Engineering, Hefei 230011, China; College of Food and Biological Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233030, ChinaCollege of Food and Biological Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233030, ChinaCollege of Food and Biological Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233030, ChinaCollege of Food and Biological Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233030, China; Corresponding author.Beef was soaked in an ultrasonic-assisted water-holding agent to increase its water-holding capacity without sacrificing its quality. Storage at -18 °C for 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the effects of the water-holding agent and ultrasound on the quality of the beef were discussed, along with the centrifugal loss rate, pH, texture, water distribution, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and other indexes. The centrifugal loss of the control group was found to be 14.33 %, while the chitosan treatment had the lowest centrifugal loss. The centrifugal losses of compound phosphate, soybean dietary fiber, and chitosan were found to be 10.77 %, 11.86 %, and 12.10 %, respectively, over the 28-days freezing time. Furthermore, there was less water migration and a lower free water P22 value in the chitosan and compound phosphate treatment groups, indicating improved water maintenance capabilities. The highest TBARS value in the control group was 1.17 mg/kg, and the lowest value of compound phosphate was 0.91 mg/kg, indicating that the compound phosphate had a good effect on lipid peroxidation. The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the water-holding properties of water-holding agents in frozen beef and serve as a guide for using these agents in the food industry.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772753X24002521BeefUltrasoundWater-holding agentFrozen storageQuality characteristics
spellingShingle Jie Wu
Yuting Tao
Shanshan Ding
Jing Xu
Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
Food Chemistry Advances
Beef
Ultrasound
Water-holding agent
Frozen storage
Quality characteristics
title Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
title_full Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
title_fullStr Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
title_full_unstemmed Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
title_short Effect of ultrasound-assisted water-holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
title_sort effect of ultrasound assisted water holding agent on the quality of frozen stored beef
topic Beef
Ultrasound
Water-holding agent
Frozen storage
Quality characteristics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772753X24002521
work_keys_str_mv AT jiewu effectofultrasoundassistedwaterholdingagentonthequalityoffrozenstoredbeef
AT yutingtao effectofultrasoundassistedwaterholdingagentonthequalityoffrozenstoredbeef
AT shanshanding effectofultrasoundassistedwaterholdingagentonthequalityoffrozenstoredbeef
AT jingxu effectofultrasoundassistedwaterholdingagentonthequalityoffrozenstoredbeef