A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese

ABSTRACT Highly abundant resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) cause property damage throughout their range. Effective reduction and management of these populations requires knowledge of their population dynamics and responses to management actions. We used data from New Jersey, USA, and other r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie A. Beston, Christopher K. Williams, Theodore C. Nichols, Paul M. Castelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.618
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850115824325492736
author Julie A. Beston
Christopher K. Williams
Theodore C. Nichols
Paul M. Castelli
author_facet Julie A. Beston
Christopher K. Williams
Theodore C. Nichols
Paul M. Castelli
author_sort Julie A. Beston
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Highly abundant resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) cause property damage throughout their range. Effective reduction and management of these populations requires knowledge of their population dynamics and responses to management actions. We used data from New Jersey, USA, and other resident Canada goose populations to produce stage‐structured matrix models for resident Canada geese from both urban and rural landscapes. We ran stochastic simulations to assess 3 management activities for Atlantic Flyway Resident Population Canada geese: harvest, nest treatment, and cull. Unrealistic harvest rates, in excess of 10% for urban geese, would be needed to reduce the urban population to target levels within 10 years in the absence of other management activities. Nest treatment to prevent hatching is less controversial than culling adults, but as many as 62% of eggs in urban areas would need to be treated annually to sufficiently reduce the mean stochastic population growth rate. Cull would be the most effective way to achieve the population goal, but current cull rates are insufficient to reduce the urban population. Although reduction of urban geese was a challenge, current management activities in rural populations appeared to be sufficient to reduce populations. We also provide a simple spreadsheet tool for managers who want to explore management options for other resident Canada goose populations by inserting relevant vital rate estimates for their populations and manipulating management activities. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-32403c86392848c2942d64f1bb778eee
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-32403c86392848c2942d64f1bb778eee2025-08-20T02:36:28ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402016-03-0140110611110.1002/wsb.618A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geeseJulie A. Beston0Christopher K. Williams1Theodore C. Nichols2Paul M. Castelli3Department of Entomology and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Delaware250 Townsend HallNewarkDE19716USADepartment of Entomology and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Delaware250 Townsend HallNewarkDE19716USANew Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife2201 County Route 631WoodbineNJ08270USAUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceEdwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife RefugeP.O. Box 72 800 Great Creek RoadOceanvilleNJ08231USAABSTRACT Highly abundant resident Canada geese (Branta canadensis) cause property damage throughout their range. Effective reduction and management of these populations requires knowledge of their population dynamics and responses to management actions. We used data from New Jersey, USA, and other resident Canada goose populations to produce stage‐structured matrix models for resident Canada geese from both urban and rural landscapes. We ran stochastic simulations to assess 3 management activities for Atlantic Flyway Resident Population Canada geese: harvest, nest treatment, and cull. Unrealistic harvest rates, in excess of 10% for urban geese, would be needed to reduce the urban population to target levels within 10 years in the absence of other management activities. Nest treatment to prevent hatching is less controversial than culling adults, but as many as 62% of eggs in urban areas would need to be treated annually to sufficiently reduce the mean stochastic population growth rate. Cull would be the most effective way to achieve the population goal, but current cull rates are insufficient to reduce the urban population. Although reduction of urban geese was a challenge, current management activities in rural populations appeared to be sufficient to reduce populations. We also provide a simple spreadsheet tool for managers who want to explore management options for other resident Canada goose populations by inserting relevant vital rate estimates for their populations and manipulating management activities. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.618Atlantic FlywayBranta canadensisCanada geesecullegg addlingharvest
spellingShingle Julie A. Beston
Christopher K. Williams
Theodore C. Nichols
Paul M. Castelli
A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Atlantic Flyway
Branta canadensis
Canada geese
cull
egg addling
harvest
title A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
title_full A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
title_fullStr A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
title_full_unstemmed A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
title_short A population model for management of Atlantic flyway resident population Canada geese
title_sort population model for management of atlantic flyway resident population canada geese
topic Atlantic Flyway
Branta canadensis
Canada geese
cull
egg addling
harvest
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.618
work_keys_str_mv AT julieabeston apopulationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT christopherkwilliams apopulationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT theodorecnichols apopulationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT paulmcastelli apopulationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT julieabeston populationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT christopherkwilliams populationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT theodorecnichols populationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese
AT paulmcastelli populationmodelformanagementofatlanticflywayresidentpopulationcanadageese