Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review
Objectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcome after maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split-crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft. Material and Methods:...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/4/e2/v10n4e2ht.htm |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849707176004681728 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Starch-Jensen Jonas Peter Becktor |
| author_facet | Thomas Starch-Jensen Jonas Peter Becktor |
| author_sort | Thomas Starch-Jensen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcome after maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split-crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft.
Material and Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until 8th of February, 2018 were included.
Results: One comparative and four noncomparative studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Both treatment modalities disclosed high survival rate of implants with few complications. High survival rate of prosthesis, implant stability values, limited peri-implant marginal bone loss and gain in maxillary alveolar ridge width were reported with the split-crest technique. Patient-reported outcome measure and length of patient treatment time was not assessed in any of the included studies.
Conclusions: The split-crest technique seems to be useful for horizontal augmentation of maxillary alveolar deficiencies with high survival rate of prosthesis and implants. However, further long-term randomized controlled trials with larger patient sample as well as assessment of patient-reported outcome measures and patient treatment time are needed before well-defined conclusions can be provided about the two treatment modalities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-31d99d14bf0b43e68417d9b00d2b86a6 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2029-283X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-31d99d14bf0b43e68417d9b00d2b86a62025-08-20T03:16:00ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2019-12-01104e210.5037/jomr.2019.10402Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic ReviewThomas Starch-JensenJonas Peter BecktorObjectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcome after maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split-crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft. Material and Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until 8th of February, 2018 were included. Results: One comparative and four noncomparative studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Both treatment modalities disclosed high survival rate of implants with few complications. High survival rate of prosthesis, implant stability values, limited peri-implant marginal bone loss and gain in maxillary alveolar ridge width were reported with the split-crest technique. Patient-reported outcome measure and length of patient treatment time was not assessed in any of the included studies. Conclusions: The split-crest technique seems to be useful for horizontal augmentation of maxillary alveolar deficiencies with high survival rate of prosthesis and implants. However, further long-term randomized controlled trials with larger patient sample as well as assessment of patient-reported outcome measures and patient treatment time are needed before well-defined conclusions can be provided about the two treatment modalities.https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/4/e2/v10n4e2ht.htmdental implantsdentistryguided tissue regenerationmaxillaoral surgical proceduresreview |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Starch-Jensen Jonas Peter Becktor Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research dental implants dentistry guided tissue regeneration maxilla oral surgical procedures review |
| title | Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review |
| title_full | Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review |
| title_short | Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review |
| title_sort | maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft a systematic review |
| topic | dental implants dentistry guided tissue regeneration maxilla oral surgical procedures review |
| url | https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/4/e2/v10n4e2ht.htm |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasstarchjensen maxillaryalveolarridgeexpansionwithsplitcresttechniquecomparedwithlateralridgeaugmentationwithautogenousboneblockgraftasystematicreview AT jonaspeterbecktor maxillaryalveolarridgeexpansionwithsplitcresttechniquecomparedwithlateralridgeaugmentationwithautogenousboneblockgraftasystematicreview |