Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure
Purpose. To evaluate the restoration of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and its influence on visual prognosis 1 year after surgical macular hole (MH) closure. Method. Subjects were patients with stage 2, 3, or 4 idiopathic MH who underwent primary vitrectomy that resulted in successful hole closure. Ninetee...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1769794 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832554624313196544 |
---|---|
author | Hiruma Hasebe Naoki Matsuoka Hiroko Terashima Ryo Sasaki Eriko Ueda Takeo Fukuchi |
author_facet | Hiruma Hasebe Naoki Matsuoka Hiroko Terashima Ryo Sasaki Eriko Ueda Takeo Fukuchi |
author_sort | Hiruma Hasebe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose. To evaluate the restoration of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and its influence on visual prognosis 1 year after surgical macular hole (MH) closure. Method. Subjects were patients with stage 2, 3, or 4 idiopathic MH who underwent primary vitrectomy that resulted in successful hole closure. Nineteen eyes with both EZ disruption with foveal detachment and a continuous external limiting membrane on optical coherence tomography during the early postoperative period were included in this study. Result. EZ disruption was restored in 10 eyes (53%, Group A) and remained in 9 eyes (47%, Group B) at 1 year after surgery. In Group B, the diameter of the residual EZ disruption was 54.7±33.1 μm. LogMAR visual acuity (VA) 1 year after surgery was significantly better than preoperative VA in each group (Group A: -0.007±0.102; P<0.001; Group B: 0.051±0.148; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.332). There was no significant correlation between logMAR VA and EZ disruption diameter at 1 year after surgery. Conclusion. EZ was restored in 53% of eyes at 1 year after surgical closure of idiopathic MH. Mean residual EZ disruption diameter was 54.7±33.1 μm. Neither resolved nor residual EZ disruption influenced postoperative VA. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-31c70f4c9a0f4335884f041464673d98 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
spelling | doaj-art-31c70f4c9a0f4335884f041464673d982025-02-03T05:51:00ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/17697941769794Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole ClosureHiruma Hasebe0Naoki Matsuoka1Hiroko Terashima2Ryo Sasaki3Eriko Ueda4Takeo Fukuchi5Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 9518510, JapanPurpose. To evaluate the restoration of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and its influence on visual prognosis 1 year after surgical macular hole (MH) closure. Method. Subjects were patients with stage 2, 3, or 4 idiopathic MH who underwent primary vitrectomy that resulted in successful hole closure. Nineteen eyes with both EZ disruption with foveal detachment and a continuous external limiting membrane on optical coherence tomography during the early postoperative period were included in this study. Result. EZ disruption was restored in 10 eyes (53%, Group A) and remained in 9 eyes (47%, Group B) at 1 year after surgery. In Group B, the diameter of the residual EZ disruption was 54.7±33.1 μm. LogMAR visual acuity (VA) 1 year after surgery was significantly better than preoperative VA in each group (Group A: -0.007±0.102; P<0.001; Group B: 0.051±0.148; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.332). There was no significant correlation between logMAR VA and EZ disruption diameter at 1 year after surgery. Conclusion. EZ was restored in 53% of eyes at 1 year after surgical closure of idiopathic MH. Mean residual EZ disruption diameter was 54.7±33.1 μm. Neither resolved nor residual EZ disruption influenced postoperative VA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1769794 |
spellingShingle | Hiruma Hasebe Naoki Matsuoka Hiroko Terashima Ryo Sasaki Eriko Ueda Takeo Fukuchi Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure Journal of Ophthalmology |
title | Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure |
title_full | Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure |
title_fullStr | Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure |
title_full_unstemmed | Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure |
title_short | Restoration of the Ellipsoid Zone and Visual Prognosis at 1 Year after Surgical Macular Hole Closure |
title_sort | restoration of the ellipsoid zone and visual prognosis at 1 year after surgical macular hole closure |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1769794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirumahasebe restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure AT naokimatsuoka restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure AT hirokoterashima restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure AT ryosasaki restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure AT erikoueda restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure AT takeofukuchi restorationoftheellipsoidzoneandvisualprognosisat1yearaftersurgicalmacularholeclosure |