Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya

African grasslands provide benefits for human communities but are negatively impacted by climate change. Climate impacts, combined with human population growth, can increase competition and conflict among humans and wildlife. Grassland restoration, a type of Nature-based Solution for climate adaptat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camila I. Donatti, Nora Moraga-Lewy, Josephat Nyongesa, Maureen Mwanzia, Janet Edmond, Giacomo Fedele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431316/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850024329818931200
author Camila I. Donatti
Camila I. Donatti
Nora Moraga-Lewy
Josephat Nyongesa
Maureen Mwanzia
Janet Edmond
Giacomo Fedele
author_facet Camila I. Donatti
Camila I. Donatti
Nora Moraga-Lewy
Josephat Nyongesa
Maureen Mwanzia
Janet Edmond
Giacomo Fedele
author_sort Camila I. Donatti
collection DOAJ
description African grasslands provide benefits for human communities but are negatively impacted by climate change. Climate impacts, combined with human population growth, can increase competition and conflict among humans and wildlife. Grassland restoration, a type of Nature-based Solution for climate adaptation, can improve farmers’ livelihoods by increasing the availability of water and pasture for livestock during drought events. Grassland restoration can also potentially help farmers adapt to climate change by providing human security benefits through a reduction in conflicts, which can also reduce consequent retaliatory measures on wildlife. However, those connections have not been widely explored. This paper assesses whether grassland restoration can reduce human-wildlife and social conflicts in Kenya. We collected information on conflicts using household surveys implemented over 16 months in a total of 1,567 households in Chyulu Hills when grassland restoration was also implemented. Results showed that 88.9% of the households interviewed experienced human-wildlife conflicts and 32% experienced social conflicts. There was a negative and significant correlation between the area restored in each site and both the number of human-wildlife conflicts and the number of social conflicts, showing that conflicts decrease as restoration increases. We also used time as a proxy for restoration, as areas restored and restoration activities increased through time. We did not find a decrease in human-wildlife conflicts over time, but we did find an overall decrease in social conflicts over time, as well as a reduction in the feeling of insecurity. However, not all households behave in the same way. Households led by women experienced a higher number of social conflicts compared to households led by men. Likewise, a higher number of households led by women had a perception of insecurity compared to households led by men. The results of this study provides recommendations for future projects, stakeholders, policy and decisions makers: a) to continue tracking conflicts in Chyulu Hills to understand the connections between grassland restoration and conflicts in the long-term, b) to identify and scale-up measures to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts considering the multiple conflict-causing species, including humans, and c) to consider the needs, perceptions and interests of women in designing strategies to mitigate conflicts.
format Article
id doaj-art-31af90b6f4ef4a0191b44405cb2198bb
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-665X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj-art-31af90b6f4ef4a0191b44405cb2198bb2025-08-20T03:01:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2025-02-011210.3389/fenvs.2024.14313161431316Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, KenyaCamila I. Donatti0Camila I. Donatti1Nora Moraga-Lewy2Josephat Nyongesa3Maureen Mwanzia4Janet Edmond5Giacomo Fedele6Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United StatesCenter for Communities and Conservation, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, United StatesKenya Country Program, Conservation International, Nairobi, KenyaKenya Country Program, Conservation International, Nairobi, KenyaCenter for Communities and Conservation, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, United StatesCenter for Natural Climate Solutions, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, United StatesAfrican grasslands provide benefits for human communities but are negatively impacted by climate change. Climate impacts, combined with human population growth, can increase competition and conflict among humans and wildlife. Grassland restoration, a type of Nature-based Solution for climate adaptation, can improve farmers’ livelihoods by increasing the availability of water and pasture for livestock during drought events. Grassland restoration can also potentially help farmers adapt to climate change by providing human security benefits through a reduction in conflicts, which can also reduce consequent retaliatory measures on wildlife. However, those connections have not been widely explored. This paper assesses whether grassland restoration can reduce human-wildlife and social conflicts in Kenya. We collected information on conflicts using household surveys implemented over 16 months in a total of 1,567 households in Chyulu Hills when grassland restoration was also implemented. Results showed that 88.9% of the households interviewed experienced human-wildlife conflicts and 32% experienced social conflicts. There was a negative and significant correlation between the area restored in each site and both the number of human-wildlife conflicts and the number of social conflicts, showing that conflicts decrease as restoration increases. We also used time as a proxy for restoration, as areas restored and restoration activities increased through time. We did not find a decrease in human-wildlife conflicts over time, but we did find an overall decrease in social conflicts over time, as well as a reduction in the feeling of insecurity. However, not all households behave in the same way. Households led by women experienced a higher number of social conflicts compared to households led by men. Likewise, a higher number of households led by women had a perception of insecurity compared to households led by men. The results of this study provides recommendations for future projects, stakeholders, policy and decisions makers: a) to continue tracking conflicts in Chyulu Hills to understand the connections between grassland restoration and conflicts in the long-term, b) to identify and scale-up measures to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts considering the multiple conflict-causing species, including humans, and c) to consider the needs, perceptions and interests of women in designing strategies to mitigate conflicts.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431316/fullclimate change adaptationMaasai communitiesrestorationconflict-mitigating strategiesAfrican grasslandshuman security
spellingShingle Camila I. Donatti
Camila I. Donatti
Nora Moraga-Lewy
Josephat Nyongesa
Maureen Mwanzia
Janet Edmond
Giacomo Fedele
Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
Frontiers in Environmental Science
climate change adaptation
Maasai communities
restoration
conflict-mitigating strategies
African grasslands
human security
title Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
title_full Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
title_fullStr Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
title_short Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya
title_sort grassland restoration impacts human wildlife and social conflicts in the chyulu hills kenya
topic climate change adaptation
Maasai communities
restoration
conflict-mitigating strategies
African grasslands
human security
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431316/full
work_keys_str_mv AT camilaidonatti grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT camilaidonatti grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT noramoragalewy grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT josephatnyongesa grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT maureenmwanzia grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT janetedmond grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya
AT giacomofedele grasslandrestorationimpactshumanwildlifeandsocialconflictsinthechyuluhillskenya