Descriptions of advanced multimorbidity: A scoping review with content analysis

Introduction Multimorbidity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased symptom burden and healthcare utilisation, particularly towards the end of life. Despite this, there is no accepted method to identify the point at which individuals with deteriorating health due to long-te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah P Bowers, Polly Black, Lewis McCheyne, Darcy Wilson, Rose S Penfold, Liam Stapleton, Pam Channer, Sarah E E Mills, Linda Williams, Frances Quirk, Jo Bowden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-03-01
Series:Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251326309
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Multimorbidity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased symptom burden and healthcare utilisation, particularly towards the end of life. Despite this, there is no accepted method to identify the point at which individuals with deteriorating health due to long-term conditions are nearing the end of life or might benefit from a palliative care approach – conceptualised as ‘Advanced Multimorbidity’. This scoping review explored how Advanced Multimorbidity is described and operationalised within the literature. Methods Multiple electronic databases and Grey Literature sources were searched following scoping review frameworks. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. Content analysis was used to examine the different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity. Stakeholder consultations were undertaken with clinicians, academics and public participants. Patient and public involvement was separately integrated throughout this review from conceptualisation, design and reporting. Results Forty-four different descriptions of Advanced Multimorbidity were identified from 38 publications. These varied in terms of the clinical conditions and descriptors used. Eighteen descriptions relied on a single indicator to identify Advanced Multimorbidity; 24 used a multidimensional approach. Stakeholder consultations highlighted the need for descriptions that are user-friendly and actionable. Conclusion The lack of a standardised definition of Advanced Multimorbidity risks variance in clinical and research practice, potentially affecting patient care. A consensus on defining Advanced Multimorbidity would enable better identification of patients who could benefit from a palliative care approach, ensuring more consistent and person-centred care, as well as supporting research and policy development.
ISSN:2633-5565