INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE

International jurisdiction, as a special type of jurisdiction exercised by national courts or other bodies to resolve private law disputes with a foreign element, is activated whenever a relevant foreign element exists in the dispute. This foreign element may either define the civil or commercial l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jelena Stojsic Dabetic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary 2025-04-01
Series:Pravo
Subjects:
Online Access:https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/880
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850203299143221248
author Jelena Stojsic Dabetic
author_facet Jelena Stojsic Dabetic
author_sort Jelena Stojsic Dabetic
collection DOAJ
description International jurisdiction, as a special type of jurisdiction exercised by national courts or other bodies to resolve private law disputes with a foreign element, is activated whenever a relevant foreign element exists in the dispute. This foreign element may either define the civil or commercial law relationship or link the dispute to a state, or several states, other than the state of the court. Issues related to international jurisdiction fall under the domain of international civil procedural law, and the applicable procedural rules are outlined in the Law on the Resolution of Conflicts of Laws with the Regulations of Other Countries, the Law on Civil Procedure, and relevant international agreements, depending on the nature of the disputed legal issue. The legal provisions in these two laws, functioning as general (lex generalis) and special (lex specialis) laws, differ primarily in how the principle of perpetuation of jurisdiction is applied. This situation leaves practice and doctrine to provide applicable solutions. This paper will present and analyze doctrinal viewpoints and judicial practice concerning the establishment of international jurisdiction, with the aim of evaluating the proposed solution in the draft of the new Law on Private International Law. The objective of the paper is to further clarify the specific procedural situation in which courts, having established their international jurisdiction, may encounter facts that have changed during the course of the proceedings.
format Article
id doaj-art-316b069ab5ae4fcaabda2ebd53cbc4a4
institution OA Journals
issn 0352-3713
2683-5711
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary
record_format Article
series Pravo
spelling doaj-art-316b069ab5ae4fcaabda2ebd53cbc4a42025-08-20T02:11:34ZengUniversity Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and JudiciaryPravo0352-37132683-57112025-04-0142110.5937/ptp2501077SINTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUEJelena Stojsic Dabetic0University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia International jurisdiction, as a special type of jurisdiction exercised by national courts or other bodies to resolve private law disputes with a foreign element, is activated whenever a relevant foreign element exists in the dispute. This foreign element may either define the civil or commercial law relationship or link the dispute to a state, or several states, other than the state of the court. Issues related to international jurisdiction fall under the domain of international civil procedural law, and the applicable procedural rules are outlined in the Law on the Resolution of Conflicts of Laws with the Regulations of Other Countries, the Law on Civil Procedure, and relevant international agreements, depending on the nature of the disputed legal issue. The legal provisions in these two laws, functioning as general (lex generalis) and special (lex specialis) laws, differ primarily in how the principle of perpetuation of jurisdiction is applied. This situation leaves practice and doctrine to provide applicable solutions. This paper will present and analyze doctrinal viewpoints and judicial practice concerning the establishment of international jurisdiction, with the aim of evaluating the proposed solution in the draft of the new Law on Private International Law. The objective of the paper is to further clarify the specific procedural situation in which courts, having established their international jurisdiction, may encounter facts that have changed during the course of the proceedings. https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/880international jurisdictionestablishment of jurisdictionthe principle of perpetuation of jurisdictionperpetuatio iurisdictionis
spellingShingle Jelena Stojsic Dabetic
INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
Pravo
international jurisdiction
establishment of jurisdiction
the principle of perpetuation of jurisdiction
perpetuatio iurisdictionis
title INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
title_full INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
title_fullStr INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
title_full_unstemmed INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
title_short INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION – DILEMMAS OF A SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL ISSUE
title_sort international jurisdiction dilemmas of a specific procedural issue
topic international jurisdiction
establishment of jurisdiction
the principle of perpetuation of jurisdiction
perpetuatio iurisdictionis
url https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/880
work_keys_str_mv AT jelenastojsicdabetic internationaljurisdictiondilemmasofaspecificproceduralissue