HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS
The aim of this text is to reconstruct the meanings of the concept of hermeneutical truth, as it has been defined and explained in the main projects of modern hermeneutics (Dannhauer, Chladenius, Meier, Schleiermacher, Fr. Schlegel). I will explore the epistemological side of this concept, different...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Babeș-Bolyai University
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai. Philosophia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/5403 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849247418720190464 |
|---|---|
| author | George BONDOR |
| author_facet | George BONDOR |
| author_sort | George BONDOR |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this text is to reconstruct the meanings of the concept of hermeneutical truth, as it has been defined and explained in the main projects of modern hermeneutics (Dannhauer, Chladenius, Meier, Schleiermacher, Fr. Schlegel). I will explore the epistemological side of this concept, different from its meaning in hermeneutic ontology. Understood as correctness by modern hermeneutics, truth has been related to the authorial intention. The thesis I am arguing is that the meanings of hermeneutical truth and, related to them, the modern theories of authorial intention differ according to the metaphysical presuppositions that define the thought paradigms of modernity (Cartesianism, Kantianism, Romanticism and German Idealism): the centrality and activism of the self, the rationality of the self, the dependence of knowledge on the ideal of method, the discovery of the unconscious. Some modern hermeneutical theories express the tensions between these philosophical paradigms. However, I will argue that the authorial intention remains a limit of interpretation that prevents the risks of arbitrariness and hermeneutic relativism.
Translated by Mariana Constantinescu
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-310fcbd66ccf487996031bd915e1df09 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2065-9407 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Babeș-Bolyai University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai. Philosophia |
| spelling | doaj-art-310fcbd66ccf487996031bd915e1df092025-08-20T03:58:14ZdeuBabeș-Bolyai UniversityStudia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai. Philosophia2065-94072023-04-0168110.24193/subbphil.2023.1.03HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTSGeorge BONDOR0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-3146Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Bulevardul Carol I, Nr.11, 700506, Iaşi, România, bondor@uaic.roThe aim of this text is to reconstruct the meanings of the concept of hermeneutical truth, as it has been defined and explained in the main projects of modern hermeneutics (Dannhauer, Chladenius, Meier, Schleiermacher, Fr. Schlegel). I will explore the epistemological side of this concept, different from its meaning in hermeneutic ontology. Understood as correctness by modern hermeneutics, truth has been related to the authorial intention. The thesis I am arguing is that the meanings of hermeneutical truth and, related to them, the modern theories of authorial intention differ according to the metaphysical presuppositions that define the thought paradigms of modernity (Cartesianism, Kantianism, Romanticism and German Idealism): the centrality and activism of the self, the rationality of the self, the dependence of knowledge on the ideal of method, the discovery of the unconscious. Some modern hermeneutical theories express the tensions between these philosophical paradigms. However, I will argue that the authorial intention remains a limit of interpretation that prevents the risks of arbitrariness and hermeneutic relativism. Translated by Mariana Constantinescu https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/5403hermeneutical truth, authorial intention, interpretation, understanding, hermeneutics of suspicion, Modern metaphysics. |
| spellingShingle | George BONDOR HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai. Philosophia hermeneutical truth, authorial intention, interpretation, understanding, hermeneutics of suspicion, Modern metaphysics. |
| title | HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS |
| title_full | HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS |
| title_fullStr | HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS |
| title_full_unstemmed | HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS |
| title_short | HERMENEUTICAL TRUTH AND AUTHORIAL INTENTION: MODERN PROJECTS |
| title_sort | hermeneutical truth and authorial intention modern projects |
| topic | hermeneutical truth, authorial intention, interpretation, understanding, hermeneutics of suspicion, Modern metaphysics. |
| url | https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/5403 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT georgebondor hermeneuticaltruthandauthorialintentionmodernprojects |