Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics

Abstract Multiple‐point‐based geostatistical methods are used to model complex geological structures. However, a training image containing the characteristic patterns of the Earth model has to be provided. If no training image is available, two‐point (i.e., covariance‐based) geostatistical methods a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knud Skou Cordua, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen, Christophe Barnes, Klaus Mosegaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-09-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070348
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850271835786051584
author Knud Skou Cordua
Thomas Mejer Hansen
Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen
Christophe Barnes
Klaus Mosegaard
author_facet Knud Skou Cordua
Thomas Mejer Hansen
Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen
Christophe Barnes
Klaus Mosegaard
author_sort Knud Skou Cordua
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Multiple‐point‐based geostatistical methods are used to model complex geological structures. However, a training image containing the characteristic patterns of the Earth model has to be provided. If no training image is available, two‐point (i.e., covariance‐based) geostatistical methods are typically applied instead because these methods provide fewer constraints on the Earth model. This study is motivated by the case where 1‐D vertical training images are available through borehole logs, whereas little or no information about horizontal dependencies exists. This problem is solved by developing theory that makes it possible to combine information from multiple‐ and two‐point geostatistics for different directions, leading to a mixed‐point geostatistical model. An example of combining information from the multiple‐point‐based single normal equation simulation algorithm and two‐point‐based sequential indicator simulation algorithm is provided. The mixed‐point geostatistical model is used for conditional sequential simulation based on vertical training images from five borehole logs and a range parameter describing the horizontal dependencies.
format Article
id doaj-art-30e7d68b403841eca676c27fff2b7d61
institution OA Journals
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-30e7d68b403841eca676c27fff2b7d612025-08-20T01:52:04ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072016-09-0143179030903710.1002/2016GL070348Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatisticsKnud Skou Cordua0Thomas Mejer Hansen1Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen2Christophe Barnes3Klaus Mosegaard4Climate and Geophysics Section, Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkClimate and Geophysics Section, Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkClimate and Geophysics Section, Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkDepartment of Geosciences and Environment University of Cergy‐Pontoise Cergy FranceClimate and Geophysics Section, Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen DenmarkAbstract Multiple‐point‐based geostatistical methods are used to model complex geological structures. However, a training image containing the characteristic patterns of the Earth model has to be provided. If no training image is available, two‐point (i.e., covariance‐based) geostatistical methods are typically applied instead because these methods provide fewer constraints on the Earth model. This study is motivated by the case where 1‐D vertical training images are available through borehole logs, whereas little or no information about horizontal dependencies exists. This problem is solved by developing theory that makes it possible to combine information from multiple‐ and two‐point geostatistics for different directions, leading to a mixed‐point geostatistical model. An example of combining information from the multiple‐point‐based single normal equation simulation algorithm and two‐point‐based sequential indicator simulation algorithm is provided. The mixed‐point geostatistical model is used for conditional sequential simulation based on vertical training images from five borehole logs and a range parameter describing the horizontal dependencies.https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070348geostatistical prior informationcombining vertical and horizontal informationconditional sequential simulationmultiple‐point geostatisticstwo‐point geostatisticstraining images
spellingShingle Knud Skou Cordua
Thomas Mejer Hansen
Mats Lundh Gulbrandsen
Christophe Barnes
Klaus Mosegaard
Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
Geophysical Research Letters
geostatistical prior information
combining vertical and horizontal information
conditional sequential simulation
multiple‐point geostatistics
two‐point geostatistics
training images
title Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
title_full Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
title_fullStr Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
title_full_unstemmed Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
title_short Mixed‐point geostatistical simulation: A combination of two‐ and multiple‐point geostatistics
title_sort mixed point geostatistical simulation a combination of two and multiple point geostatistics
topic geostatistical prior information
combining vertical and horizontal information
conditional sequential simulation
multiple‐point geostatistics
two‐point geostatistics
training images
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070348
work_keys_str_mv AT knudskoucordua mixedpointgeostatisticalsimulationacombinationoftwoandmultiplepointgeostatistics
AT thomasmejerhansen mixedpointgeostatisticalsimulationacombinationoftwoandmultiplepointgeostatistics
AT matslundhgulbrandsen mixedpointgeostatisticalsimulationacombinationoftwoandmultiplepointgeostatistics
AT christophebarnes mixedpointgeostatisticalsimulationacombinationoftwoandmultiplepointgeostatistics
AT klausmosegaard mixedpointgeostatisticalsimulationacombinationoftwoandmultiplepointgeostatistics