A brief history of the field shows that the impression of novelty we have today when we talk about synthetic biology is merely the sign of a rapid loss of memory of the events surrounding its creation. The dangers of misuse were identified even before the first experiments, but this has not led to a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Danchin, Antoine |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Académie des sciences
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Comptes Rendus Biologies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.5802/crbiol.173/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Curiosity and Artifice in Juan Eusebio Nieremberg’s Natural Philosophy
by: Javier Patiño Loira
Published: (2025-03-01) -
O gesto do artífice em sua prática oficinal
by: Eliane Baader de Lima
Published: (2025-06-01) -
L’artifice fait rire, a moins qu’il ne fasse pleurer
by: Jean-Jacques Lecercle
Published: (2009-12-01) -
“O’er-dyed blacks” (1.2.131) : les couleurs dans Le Conte d’hiver
by: Sophie Chiari
Published: (2011-12-01) -
De l’artifice au vacillement : “A Singing Lesson” (A Century of Roundels, 1883) d’A. C. Swinburne
by: Pascal Aquien
Published: (2009-12-01)