L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations

Abstract The efficacy of coronal mass ejection (CME) observations as a key input to space weather forecasting is explored by comparing on and off Sun‐Earth line observations from the ESA/NASA SOHO and NASA STEREO spacecraft. A comparison is made of CME catalogs based on L1 coronagraph imagery and of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard A. Harrison, Jackie A. Davies, David Barnes, Christian Möstl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-04-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003358
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536468369014784
author Richard A. Harrison
Jackie A. Davies
David Barnes
Christian Möstl
author_facet Richard A. Harrison
Jackie A. Davies
David Barnes
Christian Möstl
author_sort Richard A. Harrison
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The efficacy of coronal mass ejection (CME) observations as a key input to space weather forecasting is explored by comparing on and off Sun‐Earth line observations from the ESA/NASA SOHO and NASA STEREO spacecraft. A comparison is made of CME catalogs based on L1 coronagraph imagery and off Sun‐Earth line coronagraph and heliospheric imager observations, for the year 2011. Analysis reveals inconsistencies in the identification of a number of potentially Earth‐directed CMEs. The catalogs reflect our ability to identify and characterize CMEs, so any discrepancies can impact our prediction of Earth‐directed CMEs. We show that 15 CMEs, which were observed by STEREO, that had estimated directions compatible with Earth‐directed events, had no identified halo/partial halo counterpart listed in the L1 coronagraph CME catalog. In situ data confirms that for 9 of these there was a consistent L1 Interplanetary CME (ICME). The number of such “discrepant” events is significant compared to the number of ICMEs recorded at L1 in 2011, stressing the need to address space weather monitoring capabilities, particularly with the inclusion of off Sun‐Earth line observation. While the study provides evidence that some halo CMEs are simply not visible in near‐Earth coronagraph imagery, there is evidence that some halo CMEs viewed from L1 are compromised by preceding CME remnants or the presence of multiple‐CMEs. This underlines (a) the value of multiple vantage point CME observation, and (b) the benefit of off Sun‐Earth line platform heliospheric imaging, and coronagraph imaging, for the efficient identification and tracking of Earth‐directed events.
format Article
id doaj-art-3059f2684d574651b36e0fc640f69546
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-3059f2684d574651b36e0fc640f695462025-01-14T16:26:47ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902023-04-01214n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003358L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent ObservationsRichard A. Harrison0Jackie A. Davies1David Barnes2Christian Möstl3RAL Space STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UKRAL Space STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UKRAL Space STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UKAustrian Space Weather Office, GeoSphere Austria Graz AustriaAbstract The efficacy of coronal mass ejection (CME) observations as a key input to space weather forecasting is explored by comparing on and off Sun‐Earth line observations from the ESA/NASA SOHO and NASA STEREO spacecraft. A comparison is made of CME catalogs based on L1 coronagraph imagery and off Sun‐Earth line coronagraph and heliospheric imager observations, for the year 2011. Analysis reveals inconsistencies in the identification of a number of potentially Earth‐directed CMEs. The catalogs reflect our ability to identify and characterize CMEs, so any discrepancies can impact our prediction of Earth‐directed CMEs. We show that 15 CMEs, which were observed by STEREO, that had estimated directions compatible with Earth‐directed events, had no identified halo/partial halo counterpart listed in the L1 coronagraph CME catalog. In situ data confirms that for 9 of these there was a consistent L1 Interplanetary CME (ICME). The number of such “discrepant” events is significant compared to the number of ICMEs recorded at L1 in 2011, stressing the need to address space weather monitoring capabilities, particularly with the inclusion of off Sun‐Earth line observation. While the study provides evidence that some halo CMEs are simply not visible in near‐Earth coronagraph imagery, there is evidence that some halo CMEs viewed from L1 are compromised by preceding CME remnants or the presence of multiple‐CMEs. This underlines (a) the value of multiple vantage point CME observation, and (b) the benefit of off Sun‐Earth line platform heliospheric imaging, and coronagraph imaging, for the efficient identification and tracking of Earth‐directed events.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003358coronal mass ejectionspace weatheroff Sun‐Earth line observationsEarth‐impacting CMEs
spellingShingle Richard A. Harrison
Jackie A. Davies
David Barnes
Christian Möstl
L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
Space Weather
coronal mass ejection
space weather
off Sun‐Earth line observations
Earth‐impacting CMEs
title L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
title_full L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
title_fullStr L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
title_full_unstemmed L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
title_short L1 and Off Sun‐Earth Line Visible‐Light Imaging of Earth‐Directed CMEs: An Analysis of Inconsistent Observations
title_sort l1 and off sun earth line visible light imaging of earth directed cmes an analysis of inconsistent observations
topic coronal mass ejection
space weather
off Sun‐Earth line observations
Earth‐impacting CMEs
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003358
work_keys_str_mv AT richardaharrison l1andoffsunearthlinevisiblelightimagingofearthdirectedcmesananalysisofinconsistentobservations
AT jackieadavies l1andoffsunearthlinevisiblelightimagingofearthdirectedcmesananalysisofinconsistentobservations
AT davidbarnes l1andoffsunearthlinevisiblelightimagingofearthdirectedcmesananalysisofinconsistentobservations
AT christianmostl l1andoffsunearthlinevisiblelightimagingofearthdirectedcmesananalysisofinconsistentobservations