Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?

Purpose: The study compares the efficiency of Turkish container ports using Stochastic Frontier Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis. It aims to provide comparative insights for enhancing ports' operational performance. Capacity utilization and operational performance were analyzed in detail...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: İsmail Yenilmez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı 2025-02-01
Series:Verimlilik Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4096086
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206701828079616
author İsmail Yenilmez
author_facet İsmail Yenilmez
author_sort İsmail Yenilmez
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The study compares the efficiency of Turkish container ports using Stochastic Frontier Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis. It aims to provide comparative insights for enhancing ports' operational performance. Capacity utilization and operational performance were analyzed in detail through ratio analysis.Methodology: Two efficiency measurement techniques were employed: SFA evaluates efficiency by accounting for random errors and external factors, while DEA assesses relative efficiency by comparing ports to the best performers. Ratio analysis was used to evaluate capacity utilization through current handling capacity and annual growth rates.Findings: Significant differences were observed between SFA and DEA results. Ports like MIP MERSİN and EVYAP demonstrated high efficiency in both methods, while discrepancies were detected in ports like MARDAŞ and ÇELEBİ BANDIRMA. SFA better captures external factors and operational challenges, whereas DEA emphasizes relative efficiency. For instance, MARDAŞ exhibited rapid growth in handling volume but low operational efficiency. Ratio analysis showed varying capacity utilization levels, with some ports operating near full capacity, while others, like AKÇANSA, operate at low capacity and need operational improvements.Originality: The study provides a holistic view of port efficiency by integrating SFA, DEA, and ratio analysis. It not only measures comparative efficiency but also examines ports’ capacity utilization. Differences in efficiency measures were discussed, with SFA offering valuable insights into strategic improvements by effectively reflecting operational challenges and external factors.
format Article
id doaj-art-305242a8f58242f692e7115d1006bd23
institution Kabale University
issn 1013-1388
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı
record_format Article
series Verimlilik Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-305242a8f58242f692e7115d1006bd232025-02-07T06:03:41ZengSanayi ve Teknoloji BakanlığıVerimlilik Dergisi1013-13882025-02-01PRODUCTIVITY FOR LOGISTICS10511810.51551/verimlilik.1522007417Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?İsmail Yenilmez0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-3898Eskisehir Technical University, Science Faculty, Departmant of StatisticsPurpose: The study compares the efficiency of Turkish container ports using Stochastic Frontier Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis. It aims to provide comparative insights for enhancing ports' operational performance. Capacity utilization and operational performance were analyzed in detail through ratio analysis.Methodology: Two efficiency measurement techniques were employed: SFA evaluates efficiency by accounting for random errors and external factors, while DEA assesses relative efficiency by comparing ports to the best performers. Ratio analysis was used to evaluate capacity utilization through current handling capacity and annual growth rates.Findings: Significant differences were observed between SFA and DEA results. Ports like MIP MERSİN and EVYAP demonstrated high efficiency in both methods, while discrepancies were detected in ports like MARDAŞ and ÇELEBİ BANDIRMA. SFA better captures external factors and operational challenges, whereas DEA emphasizes relative efficiency. For instance, MARDAŞ exhibited rapid growth in handling volume but low operational efficiency. Ratio analysis showed varying capacity utilization levels, with some ports operating near full capacity, while others, like AKÇANSA, operate at low capacity and need operational improvements.Originality: The study provides a holistic view of port efficiency by integrating SFA, DEA, and ratio analysis. It not only measures comparative efficiency but also examines ports’ capacity utilization. Differences in efficiency measures were discussed, with SFA offering valuable insights into strategic improvements by effectively reflecting operational challenges and external factors.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4096086kapasite kullanımıoperasyonel performansoran analizilojistik verimliliğicapacity utilizationoperational performanceratio analysislogistics efficiency
spellingShingle İsmail Yenilmez
Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
Verimlilik Dergisi
kapasite kullanımı
operasyonel performans
oran analizi
lojistik verimliliği
capacity utilization
operational performance
ratio analysis
logistics efficiency
title Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
title_full Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
title_fullStr Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
title_short Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Container Ports: SFA or DEA?
title_sort efficiency analysis of turkish container ports sfa or dea
topic kapasite kullanımı
operasyonel performans
oran analizi
lojistik verimliliği
capacity utilization
operational performance
ratio analysis
logistics efficiency
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4096086
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailyenilmez efficiencyanalysisofturkishcontainerportssfaordea