Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations

Decreasing the share of protein contributed by animal-based foods is recommended to move towards more sustainable and healthier diets. This study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of diets with a lower share of animal protein. The diets were modeled to include the minimum share of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Aubin, F. Vieux, S. Le Féon, M. Tharrey, J.L. Peyraud, N. Darmon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124001137
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087687049248768
author J. Aubin
F. Vieux
S. Le Féon
M. Tharrey
J.L. Peyraud
N. Darmon
author_facet J. Aubin
F. Vieux
S. Le Féon
M. Tharrey
J.L. Peyraud
N. Darmon
author_sort J. Aubin
collection DOAJ
description Decreasing the share of protein contributed by animal-based foods is recommended to move towards more sustainable and healthier diets. This study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of diets with a lower share of animal protein. The diets were modeled to include the minimum share of animal protein in total protein that met nutrient requirements and did not increase costs. The new diets also minimized the difference in the quantity of food from those of observed (OBS) diets. They were modeled for five adult subpopulations (defined by sex and age) using mathematical optimization. The model was created by combining the INCA2 database (to model OBS diets in the French population) and a database of 207 food items to adjust nutritional and price parameters. All modeled diets satisfied nutritional and cost constraints. A low-animal-protein (LAP) diet was identified for each subpopulation by progressively decreasing the share of animal protein by steps of 5% until the recommended quantity of protein and/or consumption constraints were no longer satisfied. Potential environmental impacts of the LAP diets in eight impact categories were calculated using life cycle assessment and life cycle inventories from Agribalyse® 3.0. A LAP diet for the entire population was calculated as a weighted mean of the subpopulations’ LAP diets. The share of animal protein decreased from 70% in the OBS diet to 50% in the LAP diet. Compared to the OBS diet, the LAP diet decreased five environmental impacts: climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), acidification (emissions of acidifying compounds) and land occupation (all by more than 30%), cumulative energy demand (by 23%) and marine eutrophication (by 13%). Conversely, it increased three environmental impacts: freshwater eutrophication and water use (both by ca. 40%) and biodiversity damage potential (potential loss of species associated with land use) (by 66%). These results suggest that decreasing the share of animal protein to 50% is compatible with nutritional requirements, affordability and consumption constraints, but would have mixed effects on the environment.
format Article
id doaj-art-304a7b5515a040e0881c066dbe03feb0
institution Kabale University
issn 1751-7311
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj-art-304a7b5515a040e0881c066dbe03feb02025-02-06T05:11:25ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112025-02-0119101182Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulationsJ. Aubin0F. Vieux1S. Le Féon2M. Tharrey3J.L. Peyraud4N. Darmon5INRAE, Institut Agro, SAS, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes, France; Corresponding author.MS-Nutrition, 13005 Marseille, FranceIndependent Researcher in Environmental Assessment, Pépinière ESS, 23 rue des Chênes, 35630 Langouët, FranceUniversité de Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, MOISA, 34060 Montpellier, FranceINRAE, Institut Agro, PEGASE, Le Clos, 35590 Saint-Gilles, FranceUniversité de Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, MOISA, 34060 Montpellier, FranceDecreasing the share of protein contributed by animal-based foods is recommended to move towards more sustainable and healthier diets. This study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of diets with a lower share of animal protein. The diets were modeled to include the minimum share of animal protein in total protein that met nutrient requirements and did not increase costs. The new diets also minimized the difference in the quantity of food from those of observed (OBS) diets. They were modeled for five adult subpopulations (defined by sex and age) using mathematical optimization. The model was created by combining the INCA2 database (to model OBS diets in the French population) and a database of 207 food items to adjust nutritional and price parameters. All modeled diets satisfied nutritional and cost constraints. A low-animal-protein (LAP) diet was identified for each subpopulation by progressively decreasing the share of animal protein by steps of 5% until the recommended quantity of protein and/or consumption constraints were no longer satisfied. Potential environmental impacts of the LAP diets in eight impact categories were calculated using life cycle assessment and life cycle inventories from Agribalyse® 3.0. A LAP diet for the entire population was calculated as a weighted mean of the subpopulations’ LAP diets. The share of animal protein decreased from 70% in the OBS diet to 50% in the LAP diet. Compared to the OBS diet, the LAP diet decreased five environmental impacts: climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), acidification (emissions of acidifying compounds) and land occupation (all by more than 30%), cumulative energy demand (by 23%) and marine eutrophication (by 13%). Conversely, it increased three environmental impacts: freshwater eutrophication and water use (both by ca. 40%) and biodiversity damage potential (potential loss of species associated with land use) (by 66%). These results suggest that decreasing the share of animal protein to 50% is compatible with nutritional requirements, affordability and consumption constraints, but would have mixed effects on the environment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124001137BiodiversityClimate changeDietLife cycle assessmentWater use
spellingShingle J. Aubin
F. Vieux
S. Le Féon
M. Tharrey
J.L. Peyraud
N. Darmon
Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
Animal
Biodiversity
Climate change
Diet
Life cycle assessment
Water use
title Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
title_full Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
title_fullStr Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
title_full_unstemmed Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
title_short Environmental trade-offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
title_sort environmental trade offs of meeting nutritional requirements with a lower share of animal protein for adult subpopulations
topic Biodiversity
Climate change
Diet
Life cycle assessment
Water use
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124001137
work_keys_str_mv AT jaubin environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations
AT fvieux environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations
AT slefeon environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations
AT mtharrey environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations
AT jlpeyraud environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations
AT ndarmon environmentaltradeoffsofmeetingnutritionalrequirementswithalowershareofanimalproteinforadultsubpopulations