Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.

While diuron residues are being detected more frequently in agricultural soils, there is limited information available regarding their potential phytotoxicity to non-target grain crops. This study aims to determine robust phytotoxicity thresholds for three common, but contrasting, crop species (cano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Win Win Pyone, Richard W Bell, Michael T Rose, Gavan McGrath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306865
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850106129961451520
author Win Win Pyone
Richard W Bell
Michael T Rose
Gavan McGrath
author_facet Win Win Pyone
Richard W Bell
Michael T Rose
Gavan McGrath
author_sort Win Win Pyone
collection DOAJ
description While diuron residues are being detected more frequently in agricultural soils, there is limited information available regarding their potential phytotoxicity to non-target grain crops. This study aims to determine robust phytotoxicity thresholds for three common, but contrasting, crop species (canola, chickpea, and wheat) exposed to a range of diuron concentrations and to determine how loamy sand soil can change the toxicity thresholds relative to an inert sand. The log-logistic non-linear regression model proved most effective in determining toxicity thresholds by analysing crop responses to diuron. Canola was the most sensitive to diuron in sand followed by wheat and chickpea. Diuron exhibits higher phytotoxicity in sand compared to loamy sand, with ED50 values (which is the dose at which diuron causes a 50% decrease in plant growth) of 0.03 mg kg-1 and 0.07 mg kg-1 for canola shoot biomass inhibition and 0.01 mg kg-1 and 0.06 mg kg-1 for root dry weight reduction, respectively. The ED50 values for wheat shoot biomass (0.11 and 0.24 mg kg-1) in sand and loamy sand, respectively, and the ED50 values for root growth inhibition are 0.14 mg kg-1 in sand and 0.19 mg kg-1 in loamy sand. These values were lower than label concentrations and previously estimated average and maximum diuron residue loads (0.17 and 0.29 mg kg-1) in Western Australia paddocks. The larger ED50 values of diuron in the loamy sand can be attributed to higher soil organic matter and cation exchange capacity that decreased bio-available diuron levels. Average diuron residue loads in Western Australia crop fields exceed the ED50 value emphasizes the need for careful planning of crop rotations to avoid crop phytotoxicity from soil-borne diuron residues. Further study is needed to determine the effect of a wider range of soil properties such as pH, clay content, and soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity risk of diuron to rotational crops.
format Article
id doaj-art-3040fee65cdb4bdeaa67f5913204e899
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-3040fee65cdb4bdeaa67f5913204e8992025-08-20T02:38:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e030686510.1371/journal.pone.0306865Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.Win Win PyoneRichard W BellMichael T RoseGavan McGrathWhile diuron residues are being detected more frequently in agricultural soils, there is limited information available regarding their potential phytotoxicity to non-target grain crops. This study aims to determine robust phytotoxicity thresholds for three common, but contrasting, crop species (canola, chickpea, and wheat) exposed to a range of diuron concentrations and to determine how loamy sand soil can change the toxicity thresholds relative to an inert sand. The log-logistic non-linear regression model proved most effective in determining toxicity thresholds by analysing crop responses to diuron. Canola was the most sensitive to diuron in sand followed by wheat and chickpea. Diuron exhibits higher phytotoxicity in sand compared to loamy sand, with ED50 values (which is the dose at which diuron causes a 50% decrease in plant growth) of 0.03 mg kg-1 and 0.07 mg kg-1 for canola shoot biomass inhibition and 0.01 mg kg-1 and 0.06 mg kg-1 for root dry weight reduction, respectively. The ED50 values for wheat shoot biomass (0.11 and 0.24 mg kg-1) in sand and loamy sand, respectively, and the ED50 values for root growth inhibition are 0.14 mg kg-1 in sand and 0.19 mg kg-1 in loamy sand. These values were lower than label concentrations and previously estimated average and maximum diuron residue loads (0.17 and 0.29 mg kg-1) in Western Australia paddocks. The larger ED50 values of diuron in the loamy sand can be attributed to higher soil organic matter and cation exchange capacity that decreased bio-available diuron levels. Average diuron residue loads in Western Australia crop fields exceed the ED50 value emphasizes the need for careful planning of crop rotations to avoid crop phytotoxicity from soil-borne diuron residues. Further study is needed to determine the effect of a wider range of soil properties such as pH, clay content, and soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity risk of diuron to rotational crops.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306865
spellingShingle Win Win Pyone
Richard W Bell
Michael T Rose
Gavan McGrath
Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
PLoS ONE
title Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
title_full Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
title_fullStr Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
title_full_unstemmed Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
title_short Phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat, chickpea, and canola.
title_sort phytotoxicity risk assessment of diuron residues in sands on wheat chickpea and canola
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306865
work_keys_str_mv AT winwinpyone phytotoxicityriskassessmentofdiuronresiduesinsandsonwheatchickpeaandcanola
AT richardwbell phytotoxicityriskassessmentofdiuronresiduesinsandsonwheatchickpeaandcanola
AT michaeltrose phytotoxicityriskassessmentofdiuronresiduesinsandsonwheatchickpeaandcanola
AT gavanmcgrath phytotoxicityriskassessmentofdiuronresiduesinsandsonwheatchickpeaandcanola