Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches

Abstract Coupled ocean‐atmosphere models have been utilized to investigate the global climate response to polar sea ice loss using different approaches to constrain ice concentration and thickness. The goal of this study is to compare two commonly used methods within a single model framework: ice al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lantao Sun, Clara Deser, Robert A. Tomas, Michael Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085788
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849322114482438144
author Lantao Sun
Clara Deser
Robert A. Tomas
Michael Alexander
author_facet Lantao Sun
Clara Deser
Robert A. Tomas
Michael Alexander
author_sort Lantao Sun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Coupled ocean‐atmosphere models have been utilized to investigate the global climate response to polar sea ice loss using different approaches to constrain ice concentration and thickness. The goal of this study is to compare two commonly used methods within a single model framework: ice albedo reduction, which is energy conserving, and ice‐flux nudging, which is not energy conserving. The two approaches generate virtually identical equilibrium global climate responses to the same seasonal cycle of sea ice loss. However, while ice‐flux nudging is able to control the sea ice state year‐round, albedo reduction is most effective during summer and lessens the effects of climate change in winter due to the underestimation of sea ice loss. These evaluations have implications for the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP), which proposes a set of coordinated coupled model experiments but without a defined protocol on how to constrain sea ice.
format Article
id doaj-art-2fe535a94b714ab49235a1dbd0b2e888
institution Kabale University
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-2fe535a94b714ab49235a1dbd0b2e8882025-08-20T03:49:32ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072020-02-01473n/an/a10.1029/2019GL085788Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining ApproachesLantao Sun0Clara Deser1Robert A. Tomas2Michael Alexander3Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USANational Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USANational Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USANOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Science Division Boulder CO USAAbstract Coupled ocean‐atmosphere models have been utilized to investigate the global climate response to polar sea ice loss using different approaches to constrain ice concentration and thickness. The goal of this study is to compare two commonly used methods within a single model framework: ice albedo reduction, which is energy conserving, and ice‐flux nudging, which is not energy conserving. The two approaches generate virtually identical equilibrium global climate responses to the same seasonal cycle of sea ice loss. However, while ice‐flux nudging is able to control the sea ice state year‐round, albedo reduction is most effective during summer and lessens the effects of climate change in winter due to the underestimation of sea ice loss. These evaluations have implications for the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP), which proposes a set of coordinated coupled model experiments but without a defined protocol on how to constrain sea ice.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085788ice‐constraining approachespolar sea ice loss effectclimate models
spellingShingle Lantao Sun
Clara Deser
Robert A. Tomas
Michael Alexander
Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
Geophysical Research Letters
ice‐constraining approaches
polar sea ice loss effect
climate models
title Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
title_full Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
title_fullStr Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
title_short Global Coupled Climate Response to Polar Sea Ice Loss: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Ice‐Constraining Approaches
title_sort global coupled climate response to polar sea ice loss evaluating the effectiveness of different ice constraining approaches
topic ice‐constraining approaches
polar sea ice loss effect
climate models
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085788
work_keys_str_mv AT lantaosun globalcoupledclimateresponsetopolarseaicelossevaluatingtheeffectivenessofdifferenticeconstrainingapproaches
AT claradeser globalcoupledclimateresponsetopolarseaicelossevaluatingtheeffectivenessofdifferenticeconstrainingapproaches
AT robertatomas globalcoupledclimateresponsetopolarseaicelossevaluatingtheeffectivenessofdifferenticeconstrainingapproaches
AT michaelalexander globalcoupledclimateresponsetopolarseaicelossevaluatingtheeffectivenessofdifferenticeconstrainingapproaches