A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit

Abstract Background and Objective Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minna Grahvendy, Bena Brown, Laurelie R. Wishart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2024-11-01
Series:Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00461-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850057935141470208
author Minna Grahvendy
Bena Brown
Laurelie R. Wishart
author_facet Minna Grahvendy
Bena Brown
Laurelie R. Wishart
author_sort Minna Grahvendy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Objective Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-reported data, improving completeness of AE data. We explored one of these workflows in a cancer clinical trial unit. Methods The study was a single-site study conducted at a tertiary hospital located in Australia. Patients consenting to a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. Participants used an electronic platform—My Health My Way (MHMW)—to report their symptomatic data weekly for 24 weeks. A symptom list was included within the platform, along with a free text field. Data reported via the platform was compared with data recorded in the patient’s medical chart. Time taken to compile data from each source was recorded, along with missing data points. Agreement between patient-reported data and data recorded in the medical notes was assessed using Kappa and Gwet’s AC1; time taken to compile data and missing data points were assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Low agreement was found between patient- and clinician-reported data (− 0.482 and − 0.159 by Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 respectively). Only 127 (30%) of the total 428 AEs were reported by both MHMW and medical notes. Patients reported higher rates of symptoms from the symptom list, while clinicians reported higher rates of symptoms outside of the symptom list. Time taken to compile the data from MHMW was significantly less than that taken to review medical notes (2.19 min versus 5.73 min respectively; P <  0.001). There were significantly less missing data points from the MHMW data compared with the medical notes (1.4 versus 7.8; P < 0.001). Conclusions This study confirms previous reports that patient- and clinician-reported adverse event data show low agreement. This study also shows that clinical trial sites could significantly reduce the work performed by research staff in the collection of adverse event data by implementing an electronic, patient-reported platform.
format Article
id doaj-art-2fc8d790c7864b5cbd265d8dc76b7bc1
institution DOAJ
issn 2199-1154
2198-9788
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Drugs - Real World Outcomes
spelling doaj-art-2fc8d790c7864b5cbd265d8dc76b7bc12025-08-20T02:51:18ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareDrugs - Real World Outcomes2199-11542198-97882024-11-0111472573410.1007/s40801-024-00461-yA Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial UnitMinna Grahvendy0Bena Brown1Laurelie R. Wishart2Cancer Trials Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland HealthSouthern Queensland Centre of Excellence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care, Metro South Hospital and Health ServiceSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of QueenslandAbstract Background and Objective Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-reported data, improving completeness of AE data. We explored one of these workflows in a cancer clinical trial unit. Methods The study was a single-site study conducted at a tertiary hospital located in Australia. Patients consenting to a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. Participants used an electronic platform—My Health My Way (MHMW)—to report their symptomatic data weekly for 24 weeks. A symptom list was included within the platform, along with a free text field. Data reported via the platform was compared with data recorded in the patient’s medical chart. Time taken to compile data from each source was recorded, along with missing data points. Agreement between patient-reported data and data recorded in the medical notes was assessed using Kappa and Gwet’s AC1; time taken to compile data and missing data points were assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results Low agreement was found between patient- and clinician-reported data (− 0.482 and − 0.159 by Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 respectively). Only 127 (30%) of the total 428 AEs were reported by both MHMW and medical notes. Patients reported higher rates of symptoms from the symptom list, while clinicians reported higher rates of symptoms outside of the symptom list. Time taken to compile the data from MHMW was significantly less than that taken to review medical notes (2.19 min versus 5.73 min respectively; P <  0.001). There were significantly less missing data points from the MHMW data compared with the medical notes (1.4 versus 7.8; P < 0.001). Conclusions This study confirms previous reports that patient- and clinician-reported adverse event data show low agreement. This study also shows that clinical trial sites could significantly reduce the work performed by research staff in the collection of adverse event data by implementing an electronic, patient-reported platform.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00461-y
spellingShingle Minna Grahvendy
Bena Brown
Laurelie R. Wishart
A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
title A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
title_full A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
title_fullStr A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
title_short A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit
title_sort pilot study on the collection of adverse event data from the patient using an electronic platform in a cancer clinical trial unit
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00461-y
work_keys_str_mv AT minnagrahvendy apilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit
AT benabrown apilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit
AT laurelierwishart apilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit
AT minnagrahvendy pilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit
AT benabrown pilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit
AT laurelierwishart pilotstudyonthecollectionofadverseeventdatafromthepatientusinganelectronicplatforminacancerclinicaltrialunit