Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data.
In this study, we address the question whether (and to what extent, respectively) altmetrics are related to the scientific quality of papers (as measured by peer assessments). Only a few studies have previously investigated the relationship between altmetrics and assessments by peers. In the first s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197133 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Correction: Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data.
by: Lutz Bornmann, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Correction: Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The use of OpenAlex to produce meaningful bibliometric global overlay maps of science on the individual, institutional, and national levels.
by: Robin Haunschild, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Are quality assessments in science affected by anchoring effects? - Empirical results from a survey of authors assessing previously cited papers.
by: Lutz Bornmann, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Citation Concept Analysis (CCA) of concepts introduced by Pierre Bourdieu: Measuring their impact across fields and periods
by: Bornmann Lutz, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)