A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial

Abstract Dimensions of body size are an important measurement in animal ecology, although they can be difficult to obtain due to the effort and cost associated with the invasive nature of these measurements. We avoid these limitations by using camera trap images to derive dimensions of animal size....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra J. Paton, Barry W. Brook, Jessie C. Buettel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11612
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849422818233548800
author Alexandra J. Paton
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
author_facet Alexandra J. Paton
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
author_sort Alexandra J. Paton
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Dimensions of body size are an important measurement in animal ecology, although they can be difficult to obtain due to the effort and cost associated with the invasive nature of these measurements. We avoid these limitations by using camera trap images to derive dimensions of animal size. To obtain measurements of object dimensions using this method, the size of the object in pixels, the focal length of the camera, and the distance to that object must be known. We describe a novel approach of obtaining the distance to the object through the creation of a portable distance marker, which, when photographed, creates a “reference image” to determine the position of the animal within an image. This method allows for the retrospective analysis of existing datasets and eliminates the need for permanent in‐field distance markers. We tested the accuracy of this methodology under controlled conditions with objects of known size resembling Felis catus, our study species, validating the legitimacy of our method of size estimation. We then apply our method to measure feral cat body size using images collected in Tasmania, Australia. The precision of our methodology was evaluated by comparing size estimates across individual cats, revealing consistent and reliable results. The average height (front paw to shoulder) of the feral cats sampled was 25.25 cm (CI = 24.4, 26.1) and the average length (base of tail to nose) was 47.48 cm (CI = 46.0, 48.9), suggesting wild feral cats in our study area are no larger than their domestic counterparts. Given the success of its application within our study, we call for further trails with this method across a variety of species.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f72c4fd367e4fb2aeb876b7e3b401e4
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-2f72c4fd367e4fb2aeb876b7e3b401e42025-08-20T03:30:55ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-07-01147n/an/a10.1002/ece3.11612A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trialAlexandra J. Paton0Barry W. Brook1Jessie C. Buettel2School of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania AustraliaSchool of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania AustraliaSchool of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania AustraliaAbstract Dimensions of body size are an important measurement in animal ecology, although they can be difficult to obtain due to the effort and cost associated with the invasive nature of these measurements. We avoid these limitations by using camera trap images to derive dimensions of animal size. To obtain measurements of object dimensions using this method, the size of the object in pixels, the focal length of the camera, and the distance to that object must be known. We describe a novel approach of obtaining the distance to the object through the creation of a portable distance marker, which, when photographed, creates a “reference image” to determine the position of the animal within an image. This method allows for the retrospective analysis of existing datasets and eliminates the need for permanent in‐field distance markers. We tested the accuracy of this methodology under controlled conditions with objects of known size resembling Felis catus, our study species, validating the legitimacy of our method of size estimation. We then apply our method to measure feral cat body size using images collected in Tasmania, Australia. The precision of our methodology was evaluated by comparing size estimates across individual cats, revealing consistent and reliable results. The average height (front paw to shoulder) of the feral cats sampled was 25.25 cm (CI = 24.4, 26.1) and the average length (base of tail to nose) was 47.48 cm (CI = 46.0, 48.9), suggesting wild feral cats in our study area are no larger than their domestic counterparts. Given the success of its application within our study, we call for further trails with this method across a variety of species.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11612body sizeFelis catusinvasive speciesnon‐intrusivetrail camera
spellingShingle Alexandra J. Paton
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
Ecology and Evolution
body size
Felis catus
invasive species
non‐intrusive
trail camera
title A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
title_full A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
title_fullStr A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
title_full_unstemmed A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
title_short A non‐invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps: A felid field trial
title_sort non invasive approach to measuring body dimensions of wildlife with camera traps a felid field trial
topic body size
Felis catus
invasive species
non‐intrusive
trail camera
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11612
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrajpaton anoninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial
AT barrywbrook anoninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial
AT jessiecbuettel anoninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial
AT alexandrajpaton noninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial
AT barrywbrook noninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial
AT jessiecbuettel noninvasiveapproachtomeasuringbodydimensionsofwildlifewithcameratrapsafelidfieldtrial