Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.

<h4>Background</h4>With or without biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy could bring significant clinical benefit and acceptable safety profile compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer (ES-SCLC) were demonstrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuo Kang, Shan Zhao, Xiaohui Wang, Zhenhua Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328730
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849248160209174528
author Shuo Kang
Shan Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Zhenhua Pan
author_facet Shuo Kang
Shan Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Zhenhua Pan
author_sort Shuo Kang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>With or without biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy could bring significant clinical benefit and acceptable safety profile compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer (ES-SCLC) were demonstrated in EXTENTORCH trial. However, its cost-effective remains uncleared.<h4>Objective</h4>The current analysis aimed to evaluate the economic value of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) testing directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.<h4>Design</h4>A mathematical decision model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>A pharmacoeconomic decision model was developed to simulate 3-week patients transition in 20-year time horizon to access the cost-effectiveness of three competing first-line treatments among ITH-testing directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy, toripalimab plus chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone. Survival data were obtained from EXTENTORCH trial, cost and utility values were gathered from the dataset and published studies, annual discount rate of 5% was used for cost and utility values. Total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were the model outputs. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model results.<h4>Results</h4>In base-case analysis, compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, ITH-testing directed therapy could bring additional 0.14 QALYs and 0.29 QALYs, with marginal costs of $3750.75 and $7778.18, resulting in the ICER of $27,353.27/QALY and $26,461.46/QALY, respectively, which lower than the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the model results were robust, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the probability of ITH-testing directed therapy could be considered cost-effective was 61%.<h4>Conclusions</h4>ITH-testing directed treatment was likely to be the most cost-effective first-line option compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f6b2254d32e4bd696273dc594fd995b
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-2f6b2254d32e4bd696273dc594fd995b2025-08-20T03:57:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032873010.1371/journal.pone.0328730Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.Shuo KangShan ZhaoXiaohui WangZhenhua Pan<h4>Background</h4>With or without biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy could bring significant clinical benefit and acceptable safety profile compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer (ES-SCLC) were demonstrated in EXTENTORCH trial. However, its cost-effective remains uncleared.<h4>Objective</h4>The current analysis aimed to evaluate the economic value of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) testing directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.<h4>Design</h4>A mathematical decision model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.<h4>Methods</h4>A pharmacoeconomic decision model was developed to simulate 3-week patients transition in 20-year time horizon to access the cost-effectiveness of three competing first-line treatments among ITH-testing directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy, toripalimab plus chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone. Survival data were obtained from EXTENTORCH trial, cost and utility values were gathered from the dataset and published studies, annual discount rate of 5% was used for cost and utility values. Total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were the model outputs. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model results.<h4>Results</h4>In base-case analysis, compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, ITH-testing directed therapy could bring additional 0.14 QALYs and 0.29 QALYs, with marginal costs of $3750.75 and $7778.18, resulting in the ICER of $27,353.27/QALY and $26,461.46/QALY, respectively, which lower than the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the model results were robust, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the probability of ITH-testing directed therapy could be considered cost-effective was 61%.<h4>Conclusions</h4>ITH-testing directed treatment was likely to be the most cost-effective first-line option compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328730
spellingShingle Shuo Kang
Shan Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Zhenhua Pan
Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
PLoS ONE
title Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
title_full Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
title_short Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.
title_sort cost effectiveness of biomarker directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer in china
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328730
work_keys_str_mv AT shuokang costeffectivenessofbiomarkerdirectedtoripalimabpluschemotherapyforpreviouslyuntreatedextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerinchina
AT shanzhao costeffectivenessofbiomarkerdirectedtoripalimabpluschemotherapyforpreviouslyuntreatedextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerinchina
AT xiaohuiwang costeffectivenessofbiomarkerdirectedtoripalimabpluschemotherapyforpreviouslyuntreatedextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerinchina
AT zhenhuapan costeffectivenessofbiomarkerdirectedtoripalimabpluschemotherapyforpreviouslyuntreatedextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerinchina