Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study

Abstract Aim To develop and evaluate a practical, low-cost ultrasound training simulator for teaching basic ultrasound physics and knobology, including probe orientation, tissue impedance, essential hand movements, and recognizing image artifacts while observing scanned objects. Methods The simulato...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Yousef F. Abu-Zidan, Arif Alper Cevik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00637-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849766370609201152
author Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Yousef F. Abu-Zidan
Arif Alper Cevik
author_facet Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Yousef F. Abu-Zidan
Arif Alper Cevik
author_sort Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim To develop and evaluate a practical, low-cost ultrasound training simulator for teaching basic ultrasound physics and knobology, including probe orientation, tissue impedance, essential hand movements, and recognizing image artifacts while observing scanned objects. Methods The simulator consists of (1) one complete lemon, (2) half a lemon, (3) half a kiwi fruit, and (4) an avocado pit. These objects were secured inside a plastic box using screws, nails and double-sided foam tape, after which the box was filled with water. The estimated total cost was less than 15 US dollars. The simulator was prospectively tested to teach basic ultrasound physics during the period of 4th January 2021 till 14th October 2021 on 59 undergraduate junior surgical clerkship students, who had no prior exposure to ultrasound. Quantitative feedback was collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating educational value, skill acquisition, and user satisfaction. Qualitative data were obtained from open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative responses, while inductive thematic analysis was applied to qualitative comments. Results 58 students filled the questionnaire (response rate of 98.3%), 57 of them (98.3%) recommended the simulator to peers, and all assessed items received the highest median rating (5 out of 5), including items assessing conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and enjoyment. Thematic analysis provided three major themes: Learning Enhancement, Engagement and Motivation, and Training Limitations. Students reported improved understanding of ultrasound physics, artifact recognition, and probe handling. The simulator was described as engaging and enjoyable, promoting self-directed learning. However, students noted limitations related to session duration, realism, and the need for additional practice opportunities. Conclusion The proposed low-cost ultrasound simulator was highly rated for its educational value and engagement potential. Qualitative insights complemented these findings by revealing strong learner enthusiasm. Expanding session duration and increasing clinical fidelity may further enhance its utility.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f6634544b4b47f8ace70ed166d76863
institution DOAJ
issn 1749-7922
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Emergency Surgery
spelling doaj-art-2f6634544b4b47f8ace70ed166d768632025-08-20T03:04:36ZengBMCWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery1749-79222025-07-0120111610.1186/s13017-025-00637-zLunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods studyFikri M. Abu-Zidan0Yousef F. Abu-Zidan1Arif Alper Cevik2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates UniversityCivil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine Section, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates UniversityAbstract Aim To develop and evaluate a practical, low-cost ultrasound training simulator for teaching basic ultrasound physics and knobology, including probe orientation, tissue impedance, essential hand movements, and recognizing image artifacts while observing scanned objects. Methods The simulator consists of (1) one complete lemon, (2) half a lemon, (3) half a kiwi fruit, and (4) an avocado pit. These objects were secured inside a plastic box using screws, nails and double-sided foam tape, after which the box was filled with water. The estimated total cost was less than 15 US dollars. The simulator was prospectively tested to teach basic ultrasound physics during the period of 4th January 2021 till 14th October 2021 on 59 undergraduate junior surgical clerkship students, who had no prior exposure to ultrasound. Quantitative feedback was collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating educational value, skill acquisition, and user satisfaction. Qualitative data were obtained from open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative responses, while inductive thematic analysis was applied to qualitative comments. Results 58 students filled the questionnaire (response rate of 98.3%), 57 of them (98.3%) recommended the simulator to peers, and all assessed items received the highest median rating (5 out of 5), including items assessing conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and enjoyment. Thematic analysis provided three major themes: Learning Enhancement, Engagement and Motivation, and Training Limitations. Students reported improved understanding of ultrasound physics, artifact recognition, and probe handling. The simulator was described as engaging and enjoyable, promoting self-directed learning. However, students noted limitations related to session duration, realism, and the need for additional practice opportunities. Conclusion The proposed low-cost ultrasound simulator was highly rated for its educational value and engagement potential. Qualitative insights complemented these findings by revealing strong learner enthusiasm. Expanding session duration and increasing clinical fidelity may further enhance its utility.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00637-zUltrasound educationMedical studentsSimulationSurgical clerkshipMixed-methodsLearner engagement
spellingShingle Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Yousef F. Abu-Zidan
Arif Alper Cevik
Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Ultrasound education
Medical students
Simulation
Surgical clerkship
Mixed-methods
Learner engagement
title Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
title_full Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
title_fullStr Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
title_full_unstemmed Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
title_short Lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound: A mixed research methods study
title_sort lunch box and fruits as a simulator for teaching basic physics of ultrasound a mixed research methods study
topic Ultrasound education
Medical students
Simulation
Surgical clerkship
Mixed-methods
Learner engagement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00637-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fikrimabuzidan lunchboxandfruitsasasimulatorforteachingbasicphysicsofultrasoundamixedresearchmethodsstudy
AT youseffabuzidan lunchboxandfruitsasasimulatorforteachingbasicphysicsofultrasoundamixedresearchmethodsstudy
AT arifalpercevik lunchboxandfruitsasasimulatorforteachingbasicphysicsofultrasoundamixedresearchmethodsstudy