HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.

Meyer-Rath and Over assert in another article in the July 2012 PLoS Medicine Collection, "Investigating the Impact of Treatment on New HIV Infections", that economic evaluations of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in currently existing programs and in HIV treatment as prevention (TasP) program...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Till Bärnighausen, Joshua A Salomon, Nalinee Sangrujee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001263&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850162277787893760
author Till Bärnighausen
Joshua A Salomon
Nalinee Sangrujee
author_facet Till Bärnighausen
Joshua A Salomon
Nalinee Sangrujee
author_sort Till Bärnighausen
collection DOAJ
description Meyer-Rath and Over assert in another article in the July 2012 PLoS Medicine Collection, "Investigating the Impact of Treatment on New HIV Infections", that economic evaluations of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in currently existing programs and in HIV treatment as prevention (TasP) programs should use cost functions that capture cost dependence on a number of factors, such as scale and scope of delivery, health states, ART regimens, health workers' experience, patients' time on treatment, and the distribution of delivery across public and private sectors. We argue that for particular evaluation purposes (e.g., to establish the social value of TasP) and from particular perspectives (e.g., national health policy makers) less detailed cost functions may be sufficient. We then extend the discussion of economic evaluation of TasP, describing why ART outcomes and costs assessed in currently existing programs are unlikely to be generalizable to TasP programs for several fundamental reasons. First, to achieve frequent, widespread HIV testing and high uptake of ART immediately following an HIV diagnosis, TasP programs will require components that are not present in current ART programs and whose costs are not included in current estimates. Second, the early initiation of ART under TasP will change not only patients' disease courses and treatment experiences--which can affect behaviors that determine clinical treatment success, such as ART adherence and retention--but also quality of life and economic outcomes for HIV-infected individuals. Third, the preventive effects of TasP are likely to alter the composition of the HIV-infected population over time, changing its biological and behavioral characteristics and leading to different costs and outcomes for ART.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f5ddac49671478b98c332900dd8a41e
institution OA Journals
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2f5ddac49671478b98c332900dd8a41e2025-08-20T02:22:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762012-01-0197e100126310.1371/journal.pmed.1001263HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.Till BärnighausenJoshua A SalomonNalinee SangrujeeMeyer-Rath and Over assert in another article in the July 2012 PLoS Medicine Collection, "Investigating the Impact of Treatment on New HIV Infections", that economic evaluations of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in currently existing programs and in HIV treatment as prevention (TasP) programs should use cost functions that capture cost dependence on a number of factors, such as scale and scope of delivery, health states, ART regimens, health workers' experience, patients' time on treatment, and the distribution of delivery across public and private sectors. We argue that for particular evaluation purposes (e.g., to establish the social value of TasP) and from particular perspectives (e.g., national health policy makers) less detailed cost functions may be sufficient. We then extend the discussion of economic evaluation of TasP, describing why ART outcomes and costs assessed in currently existing programs are unlikely to be generalizable to TasP programs for several fundamental reasons. First, to achieve frequent, widespread HIV testing and high uptake of ART immediately following an HIV diagnosis, TasP programs will require components that are not present in current ART programs and whose costs are not included in current estimates. Second, the early initiation of ART under TasP will change not only patients' disease courses and treatment experiences--which can affect behaviors that determine clinical treatment success, such as ART adherence and retention--but also quality of life and economic outcomes for HIV-infected individuals. Third, the preventive effects of TasP are likely to alter the composition of the HIV-infected population over time, changing its biological and behavioral characteristics and leading to different costs and outcomes for ART.https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001263&type=printable
spellingShingle Till Bärnighausen
Joshua A Salomon
Nalinee Sangrujee
HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
PLoS Medicine
title HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
title_full HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
title_fullStr HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
title_full_unstemmed HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
title_short HIV treatment as prevention: issues in economic evaluation.
title_sort hiv treatment as prevention issues in economic evaluation
url https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001263&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT tillbarnighausen hivtreatmentaspreventionissuesineconomicevaluation
AT joshuaasalomon hivtreatmentaspreventionissuesineconomicevaluation
AT nalineesangrujee hivtreatmentaspreventionissuesineconomicevaluation