Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?

Objectives To determine if level 1 evidence from a landmark trial changed practice patterns for treatment of patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Two level 1 trauma centres.Participants Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Results 686 patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie Agel, Edward Harvey, Prism Schneider, Richard Bransford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031118.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850220088508022784
author Julie Agel
Edward Harvey
Prism Schneider
Richard Bransford
author_facet Julie Agel
Edward Harvey
Prism Schneider
Richard Bransford
author_sort Julie Agel
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To determine if level 1 evidence from a landmark trial changed practice patterns for treatment of patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Two level 1 trauma centres.Participants Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Results 686 patients met inclusion criteria. The pretrial cohort (n=108) was 68.5% male, with a mean age of 37.7 (±13.9) years. The post-trial cohort (n=578) was 76.1% male, with a mean age of 41.9 (±12.7) years. There was nearly a 10-fold increase in the patients treated with openreduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the post-trial cohort (34.1%) compared with the pretrial cohort (3.7%) (p<0.001). Patients in the post-trial cohort were more likely to undergo ORIF if they were <40 years (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.53 to 3.10), if their Injury Severity Score was >9 (OR=1.6; 95% CI 0.89 to 2.99) or if they were treated at a centre that participated in the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) trial (OR=5.2; 95% CI 3.31 to 8.21).Conclusions This study demonstrated a significant shift towards more frequent ORIF for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures following the COTS trial. Quantifying changes in practice pattern following publication of level 1 evidence is important to further our understanding of the impact large randomisedclinical trails are having on clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f1fcc3b771e4007b8e4bb2b782dfdcd
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-2f1fcc3b771e4007b8e4bb2b782dfdcd2025-08-20T02:07:12ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-09-019910.1136/bmjopen-2019-031118Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?Julie Agel0Edward Harvey1Prism Schneider2Richard Bransford3University Of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USADepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada1 Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada2 Orthopaedics, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USAObjectives To determine if level 1 evidence from a landmark trial changed practice patterns for treatment of patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Two level 1 trauma centres.Participants Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.Results 686 patients met inclusion criteria. The pretrial cohort (n=108) was 68.5% male, with a mean age of 37.7 (±13.9) years. The post-trial cohort (n=578) was 76.1% male, with a mean age of 41.9 (±12.7) years. There was nearly a 10-fold increase in the patients treated with openreduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the post-trial cohort (34.1%) compared with the pretrial cohort (3.7%) (p<0.001). Patients in the post-trial cohort were more likely to undergo ORIF if they were <40 years (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.53 to 3.10), if their Injury Severity Score was >9 (OR=1.6; 95% CI 0.89 to 2.99) or if they were treated at a centre that participated in the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) trial (OR=5.2; 95% CI 3.31 to 8.21).Conclusions This study demonstrated a significant shift towards more frequent ORIF for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures following the COTS trial. Quantifying changes in practice pattern following publication of level 1 evidence is important to further our understanding of the impact large randomisedclinical trails are having on clinical practice.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031118.full
spellingShingle Julie Agel
Edward Harvey
Prism Schneider
Richard Bransford
Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
BMJ Open
title Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
title_full Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
title_fullStr Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
title_full_unstemmed Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
title_short Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns?
title_sort operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has randomised control trial evidence changed practice patterns
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e031118.full
work_keys_str_mv AT julieagel operativetreatmentofdisplacedmidshaftclaviclefractureshasrandomisedcontroltrialevidencechangedpracticepatterns
AT edwardharvey operativetreatmentofdisplacedmidshaftclaviclefractureshasrandomisedcontroltrialevidencechangedpracticepatterns
AT prismschneider operativetreatmentofdisplacedmidshaftclaviclefractureshasrandomisedcontroltrialevidencechangedpracticepatterns
AT richardbransford operativetreatmentofdisplacedmidshaftclaviclefractureshasrandomisedcontroltrialevidencechangedpracticepatterns