Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory
In this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in <i>Languages</i> 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Languages |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/5/111 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849327309009453056 |
|---|---|
| author | Jan Hulstijn |
| author_facet | Jan Hulstijn |
| author_sort | Jan Hulstijn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in <i>Languages</i> 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processing pressures; the distinction between BLC and ELC; the study of heritage languages; the roles of cognitive factors in L1 and L2 attainment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2ef9eebc0441497ba10265557f07d193 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2226-471X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Languages |
| spelling | doaj-art-2ef9eebc0441497ba10265557f07d1932025-08-20T03:47:54ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2025-05-0110511110.3390/languages10050111Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC TheoryJan Hulstijn0Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The NetherlandsIn this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in <i>Languages</i> 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processing pressures; the distinction between BLC and ELC; the study of heritage languages; the roles of cognitive factors in L1 and L2 attainment.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/5/111BLC Theoryusage-based linguisticsgenerative linguisticsheritage languagescognitive factors |
| spellingShingle | Jan Hulstijn Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory Languages BLC Theory usage-based linguistics generative linguistics heritage languages cognitive factors |
| title | Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory |
| title_full | Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory |
| title_fullStr | Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory |
| title_short | Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory |
| title_sort | response to open peer commentaries of hulstijn s 2024 update of blc theory |
| topic | BLC Theory usage-based linguistics generative linguistics heritage languages cognitive factors |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/5/111 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janhulstijn responsetoopenpeercommentariesofhulstijns2024updateofblctheory |