Response to Open Peer Commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) Update of BLC Theory
In this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in <i>Languages</i> 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Languages |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/5/111 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in <i>Languages</i> 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processing pressures; the distinction between BLC and ELC; the study of heritage languages; the roles of cognitive factors in L1 and L2 attainment. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2226-471X |