Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas

Competition is commonly reflected in aggressive interactions among groupmates as individuals try to attain or maintain higher social ranks that can offer them better access to critical resources. In this study, we investigate the factors that can shift competitive incentives against higher- or lower...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikolaos Smit, Martha M Robbins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2025-08-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/107093
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849228921794461696
author Nikolaos Smit
Martha M Robbins
author_facet Nikolaos Smit
Martha M Robbins
author_sort Nikolaos Smit
collection DOAJ
description Competition is commonly reflected in aggressive interactions among groupmates as individuals try to attain or maintain higher social ranks that can offer them better access to critical resources. In this study, we investigate the factors that can shift competitive incentives against higher- or lower-ranking groupmates, that is, more or less powerful individuals. We use a long-term behavioural data set on five wild groups of the two gorilla species starting in 1998, and we show that most aggression is directed from higher- to lower-ranking adult females close in rank, highlighting rank-reinforcement incentives. Yet, females directed 42% of aggression to higher-ranking females than themselves. Females targeted groupmates of higher rank with increasing number of males in the group, suggesting that males might buffer female–female aggression risk. Contrarily, they targeted females of lower rank with increasing number of females in the group, potentially because this is a low-risk option that females prefer when they have access to a larger pool of competitors to choose from. Lactating and pregnant females, especially those in the latest stage of pregnancy, targeted groupmates of higher rank than the groupmates that cycling females targeted, suggesting that energetic needs may motivate females to risk confrontation with more powerful rivals. Our study provides critical insights into the evolution of competitive behaviour, showing that aggression heuristics, the simple rules that animals use to guide their aggressive interactions, are not merely species-specific but also dependent on the conditions that populations and individuals experience.
format Article
id doaj-art-2ee1effeb4ba4274a642a3a4f61297c9
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-084X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj-art-2ee1effeb4ba4274a642a3a4f61297c92025-08-22T11:15:28ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2025-08-011410.7554/eLife.107093Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillasNikolaos Smit0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0440-1998Martha M Robbins1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6037-7542Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, GermanyCompetition is commonly reflected in aggressive interactions among groupmates as individuals try to attain or maintain higher social ranks that can offer them better access to critical resources. In this study, we investigate the factors that can shift competitive incentives against higher- or lower-ranking groupmates, that is, more or less powerful individuals. We use a long-term behavioural data set on five wild groups of the two gorilla species starting in 1998, and we show that most aggression is directed from higher- to lower-ranking adult females close in rank, highlighting rank-reinforcement incentives. Yet, females directed 42% of aggression to higher-ranking females than themselves. Females targeted groupmates of higher rank with increasing number of males in the group, suggesting that males might buffer female–female aggression risk. Contrarily, they targeted females of lower rank with increasing number of females in the group, potentially because this is a low-risk option that females prefer when they have access to a larger pool of competitors to choose from. Lactating and pregnant females, especially those in the latest stage of pregnancy, targeted groupmates of higher rank than the groupmates that cycling females targeted, suggesting that energetic needs may motivate females to risk confrontation with more powerful rivals. Our study provides critical insights into the evolution of competitive behaviour, showing that aggression heuristics, the simple rules that animals use to guide their aggressive interactions, are not merely species-specific but also dependent on the conditions that populations and individuals experience.https://elifesciences.org/articles/107093aggression heuristicshierarchyrankrisk-takinggorillas
spellingShingle Nikolaos Smit
Martha M Robbins
Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
eLife
aggression heuristics
hierarchy
rank
risk-taking
gorillas
title Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
title_full Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
title_fullStr Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
title_full_unstemmed Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
title_short Risk-taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
title_sort risk taking incentives predict aggression heuristics in female gorillas
topic aggression heuristics
hierarchy
rank
risk-taking
gorillas
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/107093
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaossmit risktakingincentivespredictaggressionheuristicsinfemalegorillas
AT marthamrobbins risktakingincentivespredictaggressionheuristicsinfemalegorillas