Killing Neck Snares Are Inhumane and Non-Selective, and Should Be Banned

In North America, where fur trapping remains an active practice, killing neck snares continue to be used for capturing canids, particularly red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>), and gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>). However, over the last 50...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gilbert Proulx
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/15/2220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In North America, where fur trapping remains an active practice, killing neck snares continue to be used for capturing canids, particularly red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>), and gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>). However, over the last 50 years, scientific studies have consistently demonstrated that killing neck snares are inhumane—meaning that snared animals do not lose consciousness within five minutes and may remain alive for hours—and non-selective, often capturing a wide range of non-target wild and domestic animals. This non-selectivity can contribute to the local extirpation of certain species. The continued use of killing neck snares reflects a disregard for the welfare of wild mammals and poses risks to the sustainability of their populations. This persistence appears to be driven by misinformation, widespread myths, and inadequately implemented international trapping standards. These issues lead to critical questions about what must be performed to prohibit the use of these devices.
ISSN:2076-2615