Incidental Findings of Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Suspected to Pulmonary Embolism; a Brief Report

Introduction: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)  scans are increasingly used in emergency department (ED). Therefore, the observation of incidental findings (IFs) has also increased. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of IFs in patients who underwent  CTPA. Methods: All co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustafa Korkut, cihan bedel, Kürsat Erman, Serkan Yüksel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2019-10-01
Series:Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/463
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)  scans are increasingly used in emergency department (ED). Therefore, the observation of incidental findings (IFs) has also increased. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of IFs in patients who underwent  CTPA. Methods: All consecutive patients that underwent CTPA scanning for pulmonary embolism (PE) rule out between January  2017 and June  2018  were analysed. Incidental findings were divided into and reported in three categories: group 1 potentially life-threatening, group 2 required follow up, and group 3 with limited clinical significance. Results: 151 cases with the mean age of  61.2 ± 17.6 years were studied (54.3% female). PE was documented in 77 cases (50.9%). 448 IFs were detected (3 IFs were found per patient). 60 (13.3%) IFs were classified as group 1, 180 (40.1%) as group 2, and 208 (46.6%) as group 3. Cardiomegaly was the most frequent finding in group 1 (n=32), followed by aortic aneurysm (n=13). In group 2, pleural effusion (n=58) and pneumonia (n=36) were the most frequent incidental findings. Lung structure changes (n=92) and thoracic bone related findings (n=43) were the most common IFs observed in group 3. Conclusion: IFs were detected in the majority of patients that underwent CTPA. Most of these findings do not require follow-up or treatment. However, more than 50% of cases may require further diagnostic evaluation (40.1%) or immediate treatment (13.3%). 
ISSN:2645-4904