Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Increasing use of low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical diagnostics and research offers high sensitivity for kidney stones with minimal radiation exposure. However, due to reduced specificity, incidental findings potentially lead to unnecessar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Ritter, Maximilian Sabev, Olivier Bonny, Gregoire Wuerzner, Thomas Ernandez, Florian Buchkremer, Stephan Segerer, Daniel G Fuster, Beat Roth, Nilufar Mohebbi, Lena Jellestad, Andreas M Hoetker, Carsten A Wagner, Harald Seeger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328049
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849243156752629760
author Alexander Ritter
Maximilian Sabev
Olivier Bonny
Gregoire Wuerzner
Thomas Ernandez
Florian Buchkremer
Stephan Segerer
Daniel G Fuster
Beat Roth
Nilufar Mohebbi
Lena Jellestad
Andreas M Hoetker
Carsten A Wagner
Harald Seeger
author_facet Alexander Ritter
Maximilian Sabev
Olivier Bonny
Gregoire Wuerzner
Thomas Ernandez
Florian Buchkremer
Stephan Segerer
Daniel G Fuster
Beat Roth
Nilufar Mohebbi
Lena Jellestad
Andreas M Hoetker
Carsten A Wagner
Harald Seeger
author_sort Alexander Ritter
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Increasing use of low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical diagnostics and research offers high sensitivity for kidney stones with minimal radiation exposure. However, due to reduced specificity, incidental findings potentially lead to unnecessary follow-up, financial burden, and psychological distress. Gaps of knowledge remain regarding the prevalence of incidental findings and their financial and psychological consequences. This study investigates the prevalence of incidental findings in asymptomatic participants undergoing low-dose non-contrast CT scans and their economic and psychological sequelae.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective, multicentric observational study using data from the assessment for the control group of the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (SKSC). Low-dose non-contrast CT scans were analyzed for incidental findings, cost and psychological impact. Statistical analyses evaluated participant characteristics, financial and psychological consequences.<h4>Results</h4>229 participants underwent low-dose non-contrast CT scans, with 112 correctly completing the psychological questionnaires. The mean age was 42.9 years, and 56.3% were male. Incidental findings were observed in 47.2% (n = 108) of participants, with 16.6% having multiple findings. Kidney-related findings were the most prevalent, accounting for 35% of all findings. Of the incidental findings, 37.9% were classified as "incidentalomas" by the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines, and 15.7% of participants had findings that warranted follow-up according to radiology reports. In terms of costs, follow-up procedures, including imaging, consultations, and surgeries, incurred a total expense of 44'988 CHF, averaging 1967 CHF per participant and 2'999 CHF per incidental finding requiring follow-up. Surgical interventions were necessary for three participants, with individual costs reaching up to 35'208 CHF. Psychological assessment revealed that emotional distress and level of concern significantly differed across resilience levels and categories of CT findings. Participants with high resilience demonstrated lower emotional distress and concern, while those with CT findings requiring follow-up exhibited higher distress. Emotional distress was significantly greater in participants with follow-up findings compared to those without.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Low-dose non-contrast abdominal CT scans often reveal incidental findings. Follow-up tests and procedures incurred significant financial costs, occasionally even leading to unnecessary surgical or non-surgical interventions. Psychological assessments showed increased anxiety in participants requiring follow-up, particularly those with low resilience. Our findings highlight the need for improved management, patient information, and consideration of economic and psychological impacts of incidental findings in clinical research and routine in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e68730b33a1471aa45dde4c80429abf
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-2e68730b33a1471aa45dde4c80429abf2025-08-20T03:59:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01208e032804910.1371/journal.pone.0328049Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.Alexander RitterMaximilian SabevOlivier BonnyGregoire WuerznerThomas ErnandezFlorian BuchkremerStephan SegererDaniel G FusterBeat RothNilufar MohebbiLena JellestadAndreas M HoetkerCarsten A WagnerHarald Seeger<h4>Introduction</h4>Increasing use of low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical diagnostics and research offers high sensitivity for kidney stones with minimal radiation exposure. However, due to reduced specificity, incidental findings potentially lead to unnecessary follow-up, financial burden, and psychological distress. Gaps of knowledge remain regarding the prevalence of incidental findings and their financial and psychological consequences. This study investigates the prevalence of incidental findings in asymptomatic participants undergoing low-dose non-contrast CT scans and their economic and psychological sequelae.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective, multicentric observational study using data from the assessment for the control group of the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (SKSC). Low-dose non-contrast CT scans were analyzed for incidental findings, cost and psychological impact. Statistical analyses evaluated participant characteristics, financial and psychological consequences.<h4>Results</h4>229 participants underwent low-dose non-contrast CT scans, with 112 correctly completing the psychological questionnaires. The mean age was 42.9 years, and 56.3% were male. Incidental findings were observed in 47.2% (n = 108) of participants, with 16.6% having multiple findings. Kidney-related findings were the most prevalent, accounting for 35% of all findings. Of the incidental findings, 37.9% were classified as "incidentalomas" by the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines, and 15.7% of participants had findings that warranted follow-up according to radiology reports. In terms of costs, follow-up procedures, including imaging, consultations, and surgeries, incurred a total expense of 44'988 CHF, averaging 1967 CHF per participant and 2'999 CHF per incidental finding requiring follow-up. Surgical interventions were necessary for three participants, with individual costs reaching up to 35'208 CHF. Psychological assessment revealed that emotional distress and level of concern significantly differed across resilience levels and categories of CT findings. Participants with high resilience demonstrated lower emotional distress and concern, while those with CT findings requiring follow-up exhibited higher distress. Emotional distress was significantly greater in participants with follow-up findings compared to those without.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Low-dose non-contrast abdominal CT scans often reveal incidental findings. Follow-up tests and procedures incurred significant financial costs, occasionally even leading to unnecessary surgical or non-surgical interventions. Psychological assessments showed increased anxiety in participants requiring follow-up, particularly those with low resilience. Our findings highlight the need for improved management, patient information, and consideration of economic and psychological impacts of incidental findings in clinical research and routine in the future.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328049
spellingShingle Alexander Ritter
Maximilian Sabev
Olivier Bonny
Gregoire Wuerzner
Thomas Ernandez
Florian Buchkremer
Stephan Segerer
Daniel G Fuster
Beat Roth
Nilufar Mohebbi
Lena Jellestad
Andreas M Hoetker
Carsten A Wagner
Harald Seeger
Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
PLoS ONE
title Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
title_full Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
title_fullStr Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
title_full_unstemmed Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
title_short Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.
title_sort incidental findings on non contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population prevalence economic and health implications
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328049
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderritter incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT maximiliansabev incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT olivierbonny incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT gregoirewuerzner incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT thomasernandez incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT florianbuchkremer incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT stephansegerer incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT danielgfuster incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT beatroth incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT nilufarmohebbi incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT lenajellestad incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT andreasmhoetker incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT carstenawagner incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications
AT haraldseeger incidentalfindingsonnoncontrastabdominalcomputedtomographyinanasymptomaticpopulationprevalenceeconomicandhealthimplications