Effects of congruent and incongruent appetitive and aversive well-being comparisons on depression, post-traumatic stress, and self-esteem
Background: People compare their current well-being to different comparison standards (e.g. social or temporal comparisons). These standards are considered as aversive if perceived as threatening to self-motives or appetitive if perceived as consistent with self-motives. However, it remains unknown...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Emily N. Keppler, Nexhmedin Morina, Pascal Schlechter |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Psychotraumatology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20008066.2025.2454193 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
From India to Aruba: Insight into Teaching and Cultural Approaches in India and the Dutch Caribbeans Medical Education System
by: Arnaw Kishore
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Parents’ social comparisons and adolescent self-esteem: the mediating effect of upward social comparison and the moderating influence of optimism
by: Hongyang Liu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Zoomorphic and Phytomorphic Images in A. S. Pushkin’s Fairy Tales and Their Translations into Chinese Language
by: J. Wu
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Does Looking Good Equate to Feeling Good? Examining Selfie Practices, Peer Comparisons, and Self-Esteem Among Instagram Users
by: Muhammad Tanveer, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Screen time and adolescent well-being: a comparative study of Russia and Cuba
by: Dmitry Kornienko, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01)