Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery

Background: Patients having abdominal procedures might benefit from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, which are a comprehensive approach to perioperative care intended to reduce surgical stress, speed recovery, and enhance overall results. Throughout the preoperative, intraoperative,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sai Mrudula Katikam, Lokesh Kumar Komari, Sai Bhaskar Rayudu Parimi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1900_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850091008950272000
author Sai Mrudula Katikam
Lokesh Kumar Komari
Sai Bhaskar Rayudu Parimi
author_facet Sai Mrudula Katikam
Lokesh Kumar Komari
Sai Bhaskar Rayudu Parimi
author_sort Sai Mrudula Katikam
collection DOAJ
description Background: Patients having abdominal procedures might benefit from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, which are a comprehensive approach to perioperative care intended to reduce surgical stress, speed recovery, and enhance overall results. Throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages, these evidence-based methods prioritize patient-centered, interdisciplinary approaches. The effectiveness of ERAS protocols in elective abdominal operations is assessed in this research in comparison to standard care. Materials and Methods: In total, 150 patients scheduled for elective abdominal procedures participated in a prospective randomized research. They were divided into two groups: 75 patients in the ERAS protocol group and 75 patients in the standard treatment group. While the conventional group got standard treatment procedures, the ERAS group received interventions such as early mobilization, opioid-sparing analgesia, preoperative carbohydrate loading, and early enteral feeding. Postoperative complication rates, duration of hospital stay, and recovery of bowel function were the main outcomes. Readmission rates and patient satisfaction were secondary objectives. Independent t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to examine the data, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The average hospital stay for patients in the ERAS group was shorter (4.6 ± 1.1 days) than that of patients in the traditional treatment group (7.9 ± 2.3 days, P < 0.001). The ERAS group recovered their bowel function in 2.3 ± 0.8 days, which was considerably faster than the traditional group (4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). The ERAS group had less postoperative complications (10%) than the traditional group (28%, P = 0.02). Furthermore, compared to 80% in the traditional group, 95% of patients in the ERAS group had good satisfaction levels (P = 0.03). Conclusion: By decreasing hospital stays, speeding the return of bowel function, and increasing patient satisfaction while lowering complications, ERAS procedures dramatically improve recovery in elective abdominal surgery. These results lend credence to the idea that ERAS should be included into standard surgical procedures in order to improve patient outcomes. Its usefulness in other surgical fields should be investigated in future studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-2df7e2f43f6545629ba66a9858b1a0cc
institution DOAJ
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-2df7e2f43f6545629ba66a9858b1a0cc2025-08-20T02:42:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062025-06-0117Suppl 2S1805S180710.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1900_24Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal SurgerySai Mrudula KatikamLokesh Kumar KomariSai Bhaskar Rayudu ParimiBackground: Patients having abdominal procedures might benefit from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, which are a comprehensive approach to perioperative care intended to reduce surgical stress, speed recovery, and enhance overall results. Throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages, these evidence-based methods prioritize patient-centered, interdisciplinary approaches. The effectiveness of ERAS protocols in elective abdominal operations is assessed in this research in comparison to standard care. Materials and Methods: In total, 150 patients scheduled for elective abdominal procedures participated in a prospective randomized research. They were divided into two groups: 75 patients in the ERAS protocol group and 75 patients in the standard treatment group. While the conventional group got standard treatment procedures, the ERAS group received interventions such as early mobilization, opioid-sparing analgesia, preoperative carbohydrate loading, and early enteral feeding. Postoperative complication rates, duration of hospital stay, and recovery of bowel function were the main outcomes. Readmission rates and patient satisfaction were secondary objectives. Independent t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to examine the data, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The average hospital stay for patients in the ERAS group was shorter (4.6 ± 1.1 days) than that of patients in the traditional treatment group (7.9 ± 2.3 days, P < 0.001). The ERAS group recovered their bowel function in 2.3 ± 0.8 days, which was considerably faster than the traditional group (4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). The ERAS group had less postoperative complications (10%) than the traditional group (28%, P = 0.02). Furthermore, compared to 80% in the traditional group, 95% of patients in the ERAS group had good satisfaction levels (P = 0.03). Conclusion: By decreasing hospital stays, speeding the return of bowel function, and increasing patient satisfaction while lowering complications, ERAS procedures dramatically improve recovery in elective abdominal surgery. These results lend credence to the idea that ERAS should be included into standard surgical procedures in order to improve patient outcomes. Its usefulness in other surgical fields should be investigated in future studies.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1900_24abdominal surgeriesenhanced recovery after surgeryeras protocolsmultimodal analgesiapatient satisfactionpostoperative caresurgical outcomes
spellingShingle Sai Mrudula Katikam
Lokesh Kumar Komari
Sai Bhaskar Rayudu Parimi
Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
abdominal surgeries
enhanced recovery after surgery
eras protocols
multimodal analgesia
patient satisfaction
postoperative care
surgical outcomes
title Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
title_full Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
title_fullStr Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
title_short Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Abdominal Surgery
title_sort evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery eras protocols in abdominal surgery
topic abdominal surgeries
enhanced recovery after surgery
eras protocols
multimodal analgesia
patient satisfaction
postoperative care
surgical outcomes
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1900_24
work_keys_str_mv AT saimrudulakatikam evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsinabdominalsurgery
AT lokeshkumarkomari evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsinabdominalsurgery
AT saibhaskarrayuduparimi evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsinabdominalsurgery