Should patients with minor strokes be given thrombolytics?
Mild stroke symptoms are cited as the reason for not using tissue-type plasminogen activator in 29–43% of time-eligible patients. Previous studies suggested that not all of these patients had a good recovery or even survival to hospital discharge. Since then, stroke guidelines worldwide recommended...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
|
| Series: | Stroke and Vascular Neurology |
| Online Access: | https://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2024/08/01/svn-2024-003451.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Mild stroke symptoms are cited as the reason for not using tissue-type plasminogen activator in 29–43% of time-eligible patients. Previous studies suggested that not all of these patients had a good recovery or even survival to hospital discharge. Since then, stroke guidelines worldwide recommended thrombolysis in minor but disabling strokes.Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin alone for reducing subsequent events in patients with minor stroke if started within 24 hours of onset in both CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events) and POINT (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischaemic Stroke) trials. Recently, both PRISMS (The Potential of rtPA for Ischemic Strokes With Mild Symptoms) trial and TEMPO-2(The Potential of rtPA for Ischemic Strokes With Mild Symptoms) trial showed that treatment with thrombolysis versus antiplatelet did not increase the likelihood of favourable functional outcome at 90 days among patients with minor non-disabling acute ischaemic strokes. Therefore, a narrative review on thrombolysis for patients with minor strokes from published studies may help practicing clinicians. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2059-8696 |