Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin gel and Chitosan gel dressing in providing hemostasis in patients receiving Oral Antiplatelet Therapy and also to evaluate their surgical healing outcome following dental extractions. Methodology: A total of 60...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sourav Sarkar, N.T. Prashanth, E.S. Shobha, Vinod Rangan, G. Nikhila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426819302210
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850236141377159168
author Sourav Sarkar
N.T. Prashanth
E.S. Shobha
Vinod Rangan
G. Nikhila
author_facet Sourav Sarkar
N.T. Prashanth
E.S. Shobha
Vinod Rangan
G. Nikhila
author_sort Sourav Sarkar
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin gel and Chitosan gel dressing in providing hemostasis in patients receiving Oral Antiplatelet Therapy and also to evaluate their surgical healing outcome following dental extractions. Methodology: A total of 60 patients under Oral Antiplatelet Therapy indicated for tooth extraction were included for treatment in the study without altering the oral antiplatelet regimens. Patients were allocated equally in two groups; Group A: where PRF gel was packed into the extraction socket, while Group B: Chitosan hydrogel was packed. Timing of hemostasis was noted for each patient of both the groups. Patients were examined for any pain/secondary bleeding/healing/soft tissue dehiscence/alveolar osteitis in the extraction site on first, third and seventh post-operative days. Results: All extraction sockets with Platelet-rich fibrin achieved hemostasis in 2.64 min and sockets with Chitosan hydrogel achieved hemostasis in 1.182 min (p < 0.001). Post-operative pain in Group A sites (3.2, 1.4, 0.37 on 1st, 3rd &amp; 7th day respectively) was significantly lower than the control sites (3.4, 1.67, 0.53 on 1st, 3rd &amp; 7th day respectively) p-value 0.001, 0.001 respectively. Conclusion: In this study, Chitosan hydrogel dressing thus proved to be a superior hemostatic agent compared to PRF gel, that significantly shortens the clotting time following dental extraction in patients under antiplatelet therapy. But, PRF gel has superior wound healing properties than Chitosan with less postoperative pain following minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia.
format Article
id doaj-art-2db00f32e78b4013810616bbfd69fc8a
institution OA Journals
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-2db00f32e78b4013810616bbfd69fc8a2025-08-20T02:02:02ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682019-10-019433633910.1016/j.jobcr.2019.07.003Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapySourav Sarkar0N.T. Prashanth1E.S. Shobha2Vinod Rangan3G. Nikhila4Corresponding author. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560078, India.; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences and Hospitals, IndiaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences and Hospitals, IndiaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences and Hospitals, IndiaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences and Hospitals, IndiaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences and Hospitals, IndiaObjectives: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin gel and Chitosan gel dressing in providing hemostasis in patients receiving Oral Antiplatelet Therapy and also to evaluate their surgical healing outcome following dental extractions. Methodology: A total of 60 patients under Oral Antiplatelet Therapy indicated for tooth extraction were included for treatment in the study without altering the oral antiplatelet regimens. Patients were allocated equally in two groups; Group A: where PRF gel was packed into the extraction socket, while Group B: Chitosan hydrogel was packed. Timing of hemostasis was noted for each patient of both the groups. Patients were examined for any pain/secondary bleeding/healing/soft tissue dehiscence/alveolar osteitis in the extraction site on first, third and seventh post-operative days. Results: All extraction sockets with Platelet-rich fibrin achieved hemostasis in 2.64 min and sockets with Chitosan hydrogel achieved hemostasis in 1.182 min (p < 0.001). Post-operative pain in Group A sites (3.2, 1.4, 0.37 on 1st, 3rd &amp; 7th day respectively) was significantly lower than the control sites (3.4, 1.67, 0.53 on 1st, 3rd &amp; 7th day respectively) p-value 0.001, 0.001 respectively. Conclusion: In this study, Chitosan hydrogel dressing thus proved to be a superior hemostatic agent compared to PRF gel, that significantly shortens the clotting time following dental extraction in patients under antiplatelet therapy. But, PRF gel has superior wound healing properties than Chitosan with less postoperative pain following minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426819302210Antiplatelet therapyChitosanPRFHemostasisExtractions
spellingShingle Sourav Sarkar
N.T. Prashanth
E.S. Shobha
Vinod Rangan
G. Nikhila
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Antiplatelet therapy
Chitosan
PRF
Hemostasis
Extractions
title Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
title_full Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
title_fullStr Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
title_short Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
title_sort efficacy of platelet rich fibrin versus chitosan as a hemostatic agent following dental extraction in patients on antiplatelet therapy
topic Antiplatelet therapy
Chitosan
PRF
Hemostasis
Extractions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426819302210
work_keys_str_mv AT souravsarkar efficacyofplateletrichfibrinversuschitosanasahemostaticagentfollowingdentalextractioninpatientsonantiplatelettherapy
AT ntprashanth efficacyofplateletrichfibrinversuschitosanasahemostaticagentfollowingdentalextractioninpatientsonantiplatelettherapy
AT esshobha efficacyofplateletrichfibrinversuschitosanasahemostaticagentfollowingdentalextractioninpatientsonantiplatelettherapy
AT vinodrangan efficacyofplateletrichfibrinversuschitosanasahemostaticagentfollowingdentalextractioninpatientsonantiplatelettherapy
AT gnikhila efficacyofplateletrichfibrinversuschitosanasahemostaticagentfollowingdentalextractioninpatientsonantiplatelettherapy